<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beautiful sites with no (or very few) images</title>
	<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/</link>
	<description>thoughts on &#124; comments about &#124; examples of  } web design trends.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-125657</link>
		<author>Johan</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-125657</guid>
					<description>Whitespace is the key.&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whitespace is the key.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Goas</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-126278</link>
		<author>Ted Goas</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-126278</guid>
					<description>Not that well-designed, image-heavy sites, but I like a site that focuses on text design and clarity. I enjoy reading well-sized text on a light background without extra imagery to distract my eyes. It can also be easier to create a heirarchy of importance for various text items when they don't have to compete against a flash header image or an ornate navigation. Additionaly, when images &#60;em&#62;are&#60;/em&#62; used, they tend to have more of an impact, as the article points out. Great article Andrew!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that well-designed, image-heavy sites, but I like a site that focuses on text design and clarity. I enjoy reading well-sized text on a light background without extra imagery to distract my eyes. It can also be easier to create a heirarchy of importance for various text items when they don&#8217;t have to compete against a flash header image or an ornate navigation. Additionaly, when images &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; used, they tend to have more of an impact, as the article points out. Great article Andrew!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechMalaya</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-126602</link>
		<author>TechMalaya</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-126602</guid>
					<description>consistency between pages is also important. every page should be easier to the eyes and mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>consistency between pages is also important. every page should be easier to the eyes and mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-126711</link>
		<author>Lee</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-126711</guid>
					<description>&#60;a href=&#34;http://leenutter.com/&#34;&#62;LeeNutter.com&#60;/a&#62; has less images than all of those sites! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;a href=&quot;http://leenutter.com/&quot;&gt;LeeNutter.com&lt;/a&gt; has less images than all of those sites! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anto</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-126722</link>
		<author>Anto</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-126722</guid>
					<description>The site &#34;rikcatindustries.com&#34; looks a hell of a lot like, grid-focus from &#34;5thirtyone.com&#34; with the images and stuff removed...&#160;wat yous think&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site &quot;rikcatindustries.com&quot; looks a hell of a lot like, grid-focus from &quot;5thirtyone.com&quot; with the images and stuff removed&#8230;&nbsp;wat yous think&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-126737</link>
		<author>Steve</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-126737</guid>
					<description>&lt;a href="http://garrettdimon.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://garrettdimon.com/&lt;/a&gt; falls into this category&lt;a href="http://garrettdimon.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt; &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://garrettdimon.com/" rel="nofollow">http://garrettdimon.com/</a> falls into this category<a href="http://garrettdimon.com/" rel="nofollow"> </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imagem não é nada &#124; design</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-126823</link>
		<author>Imagem não é nada &#124; design</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-126823</guid>
					<description>[...] mostrar que um bom layout não depende, necessariamente, de belas imagens. O Fadtastic montou uma galeria de sites que utilizam nenhuma ou muito poucas imagens. Vale a pena conferir, nem que seja para ver o que é [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] mostrar que um bom layout não depende, necessariamente, de belas imagens. O Fadtastic montou uma galeria de sites que utilizam nenhuma ou muito poucas imagens. Vale a pena conferir, nem que seja para ver o que é [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas Rafael</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-126875</link>
		<author>Jonas Rafael</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-126875</guid>
					<description>the our site also don't have much image...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the our site also don&#8217;t have much image&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127133</link>
		<author>paul</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127133</guid>
					<description>my site has only images for form fields and voting. the rest is straight up text</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my site has only images for form fields and voting. the rest is straight up text</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henry</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127165</link>
		<author>henry</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127165</guid>
					<description>elegant and beautiful:)here's my own site as an example. was inspired by partly by subtraction.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>elegant and beautiful:)here&#8217;s my own site as an example. was inspired by partly by subtraction.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127241</link>
		<author>Jermayn Parker</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127241</guid>
					<description>Hey they look good. Just goes to show that you do not need to overload with text to make it nice :D I have also just finished redesigning my website which has only three images (not inc sifr and amazon)&lt;a href="http://germworks.net/blog/2006/08/08/book-review-king-me/" title="GermWorks" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://germworks.net/blog&lt;/a&gt;Thanks&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey they look good. Just goes to show that you do not need to overload with text to make it nice :D I have also just finished redesigning my website which has only three images (not inc sifr and amazon)<a href="http://germworks.net/blog/2006/08/08/book-review-king-me/" title="GermWorks" rel="nofollow">http://germworks.net/blog</a>Thanks&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Teskey</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127264</link>
		<author>Steven Teskey</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127264</guid>
					<description>Astoundingly beautiful grids, painful attention to typography and amazing amounts of will power to polish it all off. It all comes down to how much effort you put in to make your site, sans the images, send just as powerful a message as those who do.&#160;&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Astoundingly beautiful grids, painful attention to typography and amazing amounts of will power to polish it all off. It all comes down to how much effort you put in to make your site, sans the images, send just as powerful a message as those who do.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tadeusz Szewczyk/Tad Chef</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127289</link>
		<author>Tadeusz Szewczyk/Tad Chef</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127289</guid>
					<description>I see we're on the same level as always Andrew. I love those sites, also check out this one here: http://sitening.com/ Stumbled it.&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see we&#8217;re on the same level as always Andrew. I love those sites, also check out this one here: <a href="http://sitening.com/" rel="nofollow">http://sitening.com/</a> Stumbled it.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Davies</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127333</link>
		<author>Matt Davies</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127333</guid>
					<description>Less is More...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less is More&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filosof</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127388</link>
		<author>Filosof</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127388</guid>
					<description>Nice selection, but I already know all of them :-/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice selection, but I already know all of them :-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Hodges</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127479</link>
		<author>Marcus Hodges</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127479</guid>
					<description>Peter Rozek's site is basically a direct theft of &lt;a href="http://www.markboultondesign.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Mark Boulton Design&lt;/a&gt;'s amazing site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Rozek&#8217;s site is basically a direct theft of <a href="http://www.markboultondesign.com/" rel="nofollow">Mark Boulton Design</a>&#8217;s amazing site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127605</link>
		<author>Andrew Faulkner</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-127605</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Marcus,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They do look awfully similar. The code is not that similar though. Maybe just inspiration and not a direct theft?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree, Mark's site is fantastic and should have been on the list. One for next time.&#160;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcus,</p>
<p>They do look awfully similar. The code is not that similar though. Maybe just inspiration and not a direct theft?</p>
<p>I agree, Mark&#8217;s site is fantastic and should have been on the list. One for next time.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Site Optimization &#38; with less Image &#124; My So Called Life</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-129338</link>
		<author>Site Optimization &#38; with less Image &#124; My So Called Life</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 14:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-129338</guid>
					<description>[...] &#8220;13 Simple Steps&#8221; in web site optimization and Andrew Faulkner&#8217;s &#8220;Beautiful Sites with no (or very few) Images&#8220;, I got my inspiration for my next blog design. In addition to this, my comments has been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8220;13 Simple Steps&#8221; in web site optimization and Andrew Faulkner&#8217;s &#8220;Beautiful Sites with no (or very few) Images&#8220;, I got my inspiration for my next blog design. In addition to this, my comments has been [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I like UX &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Items from a rainy day</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-131322</link>
		<author>I like UX &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Items from a rainy day</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-131322</guid>
					<description>[...] Beautiful sites with no (or very few) images [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Beautiful sites with no (or very few) images [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webmaster Libre &#124; Bellos diseños web sin apenas imágenes</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-137572</link>
		<author>Webmaster Libre &#124; Bellos diseños web sin apenas imágenes</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-137572</guid>
					<description>[...] Beautiful sites with no (or very few) images [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Beautiful sites with no (or very few) images [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flash más vivo que nunca at Webnova - Recursos Webmaster</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-137806</link>
		<author>Flash más vivo que nunca at Webnova - Recursos Webmaster</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-137806</guid>
					<description>[...] (con CSS se logra), también lo es no limitarse y conformarse con lograr sitio usables al extremo y usar texto plano siempre. Pienso que un diseñador conformista es un diseñador estancado. Si una web lo requiere podemos [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] (con CSS se logra), también lo es no limitarse y conformarse con lograr sitio usables al extremo y usar texto plano siempre. Pienso que un diseñador conformista es un diseñador estancado. Si una web lo requiere podemos [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sitios hermosos con pocas imágenes &#171; el50</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-140909</link>
		<author>Sitios hermosos con pocas imágenes &#171; el50</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-140909</guid>
					<description>[...] 15th, 2007   Hace unas semanas en Fadtastic escribieron un artículo bastante interesante &#8220;Beautiful sites with no (or very few) images&#8220;. En el examina algunas páginas que carecen de imágenes y aún así son atractivos [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 15th, 2007   Hace unas semanas en Fadtastic escribieron un artículo bastante interesante &#8220;Beautiful sites with no (or very few) images&#8220;. En el examina algunas páginas que carecen de imágenes y aún así son atractivos [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: am Design &#187; Baabelin kirjasto &#187; Artikkelikatsaus: Lokakuu 2007</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-156578</link>
		<author>am Design &#187; Baabelin kirjasto &#187; Artikkelikatsaus: Lokakuu 2007</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-156578</guid>
					<description>[...] lokakuussa näyttäviä websivustoja visuaalisen suunnittelun kahdesta ääripäästä. Artikkeli Beautiful Sites With No (or Very Few) Images käsittelee minimalistisia, liki yksinomaan typografiaan perustuvia sivustoja, Big, Bold Background [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] lokakuussa näyttäviä websivustoja visuaalisen suunnittelun kahdesta ääripäästä. Artikkeli Beautiful Sites With No (or Very Few) Images käsittelee minimalistisia, liki yksinomaan typografiaan perustuvia sivustoja, Big, Bold Background [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gp</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-175245</link>
		<author>gp</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-175245</guid>
					<description>--these are beautiful sites...and have inspired me to rethink a few of the sites i administer. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8211;these are beautiful sites&#8230;and have inspired me to rethink a few of the sites i administer. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesus Is Extravagant! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8216;Intelligent&#8217; Design</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-193092</link>
		<author>Jesus Is Extravagant! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8216;Intelligent&#8217; Design</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-193092</guid>
					<description>[...] (if you&#8217;re interested in web design at all read this post) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] (if you&#8217;re interested in web design at all read this post) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adaptiv Media</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-217518</link>
		<author>Adaptiv Media</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-217518</guid>
					<description>Rik Catlow's&#160;makes brilliant use of whitespace..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rik Catlow&#8217;s&nbsp;makes brilliant use of whitespace..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faith</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-235112</link>
		<author>Faith</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-235112</guid>
					<description>I was just looking using stumbleupon and came across cssmania.com. I know there are a lot of these sites. It just occured to me that they're all sites for graphic design not beautiful css design.&#160; I realize they are kind of offshoots of css zen garden, but I think people realize you can make sturdy sites with css without using tables now. Anyway this was what I wrote on the stumbleupon review page after looking at it.I love CSS but a lot of these css beauty sites really wouldn't be what they are without all the great graphic design on the sites. Challange: show me some awesome css with no images. Fact is if it said &#34;Table design beauty&#34; people would be amazed that someone made an awesome design still because of how great the site looks from the graphics.&#160;(ps i came across this article by googling &#34;beautiful css design with no images&#34; and yours was the 5th down.) &#160;&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just looking using stumbleupon and came across cssmania.com. I know there are a lot of these sites. It just occured to me that they&#8217;re all sites for graphic design not beautiful css design.&nbsp; I realize they are kind of offshoots of css zen garden, but I think people realize you can make sturdy sites with css without using tables now. Anyway this was what I wrote on the stumbleupon review page after looking at it.I love CSS but a lot of these css beauty sites really wouldn&#8217;t be what they are without all the great graphic design on the sites. Challange: show me some awesome css with no images. Fact is if it said &quot;Table design beauty&quot; people would be amazed that someone made an awesome design still because of how great the site looks from the graphics.&nbsp;(ps i came across this article by googling &quot;beautiful css design with no images&quot; and yours was the 5th down.) &nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane: content writer</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-265206</link>
		<author>Shane: content writer</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/25/beautiful-sites-with-no-or-very-few-images/#comment-265206</guid>
					<description>I' glad to see an article like this, simple, straight-forward sites can easily be as aesthetically pleasing as those weighed down with pictures.. More so in some cases. Its a common mistake for people to design sites that look almost kitchy due to over enthusiastic use of images</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217; glad to see an article like this, simple, straight-forward sites can easily be as aesthetically pleasing as those weighed down with pictures.. More so in some cases. Its a common mistake for people to design sites that look almost kitchy due to over enthusiastic use of images</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
