<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big, Bold Backgrounds</title>
	<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/</link>
	<description>thoughts on &#124; comments about &#124; examples of  } web design trends.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Papadopoulos</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110154</link>
		<author>Chris Papadopoulos</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110154</guid>
					<description>I don't have the raw artistic &#38; illustration talent that some have, so making those ornate backgrounds that look great is difficult for me.&#160;Personally, I've found that getting rid of background images and making things as simple as possible with a maximum amount of whitespace and &lt;a href="http://informationrain.com/2007/09/26/designing-for-thinness/" rel="nofollow"&gt;making the site thin&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://informationrain.com/2007/09/25/designing-in-your-proverbial-underpants/ rel="nofollow"&gt;letting content be the focus&lt;/a&gt; works best. I also don't like backgrounds behind text as it can &lt;a href="http://informationrain.com/2007/06/16/how-to-make-text-more-legible/" rel="nofollow"&gt;affect legibility&lt;/a&gt;.&#160;Not dissing ornate backgrounds. Some of those sites, the n.design studio one in particular, look fantastic.&#160;&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have the raw artistic &amp; illustration talent that some have, so making those ornate backgrounds that look great is difficult for me.&nbsp;Personally, I&#8217;ve found that getting rid of background images and making things as simple as possible with a maximum amount of whitespace and <a href="http://informationrain.com/2007/09/26/designing-for-thinness/" rel="nofollow">making the site thin</a> and <a href="http://informationrain.com/2007/09/25/designing-in-your-proverbial-underpants/ rel="nofollow">letting content be the focus</a> works best. I also don&#8217;t like backgrounds behind text as it can <a href="http://informationrain.com/2007/06/16/how-to-make-text-more-legible/" rel="nofollow">affect legibility</a>.&nbsp;Not dissing ornate backgrounds. Some of those sites, the n.design studio one in particular, look fantastic.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Sanders</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110171</link>
		<author>Matthew Sanders</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110171</guid>
					<description>I've asked myself the same question many times. Looking back on Joshua's site. I remember thinking that this is the sort of design I wanted to do. I don't think it's much of a load time issue anymore as it is a bandwidth issue. I don't know one person who doesn't have more than 2 - 3 Mbits internet connection and most of these graphics are under&#160; or around 150k.I think that they should start popping up more often. If the client agrees with the cost. Do it.&#160; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve asked myself the same question many times. Looking back on Joshua&#8217;s site. I remember thinking that this is the sort of design I wanted to do. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s much of a load time issue anymore as it is a bandwidth issue. I don&#8217;t know one person who doesn&#8217;t have more than 2 - 3 Mbits internet connection and most of these graphics are under&nbsp; or around 150k.I think that they should start popping up more often. If the client agrees with the cost. Do it.&nbsp; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110178</link>
		<author>Andrew Faulkner</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110178</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;&#34;I don&#8217;t know one person who doesn&#8217;t have more than 2 - 3 Mbits internet connection and most of these graphics are under&#160; or around 150k.&#34;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think it may be dangerous to assume this.&#160; I know plenty of people still on dialup here in the UK - and we're far from the slowest. As I said in the article though, within the design community designers tend to break there own rules as the assumptions change.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is a workaround for slow connections though: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you do use a large background image on the body tag, checking that the content is easily viewable (maybe by means of a solid wrapper like on N.Design) before the image has fully loaded will ensure that the site is still usable for those with slower connections. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;I don&rsquo;t know one person who doesn&rsquo;t have more than 2 - 3 Mbits internet connection and most of these graphics are under&nbsp; or around 150k.&quot;</p>
<p>I think it may be dangerous to assume this.&nbsp; I know plenty of people still on dialup here in the UK - and we&#8217;re far from the slowest. As I said in the article though, within the design community designers tend to break there own rules as the assumptions change.</p>
<p>There is a workaround for slow connections though: </p>
<p>If you do use a large background image on the body tag, checking that the content is easily viewable (maybe by means of a solid wrapper like on N.Design) before the image has fully loaded will ensure that the site is still usable for those with slower connections. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110187</link>
		<author>Brad</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110187</guid>
					<description>I would go with talent. I was very inspired by Web Designers Wall recently and I tried a big background and failed miserably.&#160; It's tough to pull off because the graphic has to carry the site and it's hard to creat an amazing graphic. Good list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would go with talent. I was very inspired by Web Designers Wall recently and I tried a big background and failed miserably.&nbsp; It&#8217;s tough to pull off because the graphic has to carry the site and it&#8217;s hard to creat an amazing graphic. Good list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Ng</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110300</link>
		<author>Terry Ng</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110300</guid>
					<description>Nick La is so damn talented!&#160;&#160; Props to both his Web Designers Wall and N. Design Studio blogs... amazing. :)&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick La is so damn talented!&nbsp;&nbsp; Props to both his Web Designers Wall and N. Design Studio blogs&#8230; amazing. :)&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110438</link>
		<author>Darren</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 06:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110438</guid>
					<description>I put it down to time. It's hard to find the time to design a visual amazing design such as those.&#160; They a\re however my favourite types but time and skill just don't like me too much lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I put it down to time. It&#8217;s hard to find the time to design a visual amazing design such as those.&nbsp; They a\re however my favourite types but time and skill just don&#8217;t like me too much lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Davies</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110458</link>
		<author>Matt Davies</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110458</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Love it! I think that a background like these can be&#160;extremely&#160;effective, but (stern face) we must be careful not to over use them and ensure that they do &#34;add&#34; something to the site in a positive way. By this I mean we don't make the backgrounds more important than the content held within them. What messages does your background send? Why is that important? Will that help you with the sites goals, ect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Design with a purpose not for the sake of it...&#160;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it! I think that a background like these can be&nbsp;extremely&nbsp;effective, but (stern face) we must be careful not to over use them and ensure that they do &quot;add&quot; something to the site in a positive way. By this I mean we don&#8217;t make the backgrounds more important than the content held within them. What messages does your background send? Why is that important? Will that help you with the sites goals, ect.</p>
<p> Design with a purpose not for the sake of it&#8230;&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vesa Virlander</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110467</link>
		<author>Vesa Virlander</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110467</guid>
					<description>I've allways liked backgrounds of the new MTV.com, check them out and hit refresh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve allways liked backgrounds of the new MTV.com, check them out and hit refresh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110509</link>
		<author>Phil</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110509</guid>
					<description>I've always liked those sorts of background. Talent is the major drawback though. I would love to have a frame like that to adorn my site, but I just can't do it (though I've tried a little, it's certainly nowhere near the examples you have shown here) and I definitely can't afford to pay someone to do it for me either.It's a tough thing to do, but do it well and your site will be remembered. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always liked those sorts of background. Talent is the major drawback though. I would love to have a frame like that to adorn my site, but I just can&#8217;t do it (though I&#8217;ve tried a little, it&#8217;s certainly nowhere near the examples you have shown here) and I definitely can&#8217;t afford to pay someone to do it for me either.It&#8217;s a tough thing to do, but do it well and your site will be remembered. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MBHayes</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110542</link>
		<author>MBHayes</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110542</guid>
					<description>While you can reach the point of over doing backgrounds... I personally love these backgrounds.&#160; To me... they break all of the sameness of the web up and create a pleasing EXTRA sort of appeal.&#160;I guess if the WHOLE OF YOUR FOCUS is the content, great cut the backgrounds... to me the overall VISUAL PRESENTATION is part of the content.&#160; I don't read Sports Illustrated cause the content is so great -- it is -- but it's a combination of the pictures and the content. &#160;&#160;Again... tastefulness must be exercised so the background doesn't OVERWHLEM everything.&#160;&#160; Sidenote, the WINDOWS OS is bloated and sure I could actually get work done is &lt;strong&gt;DOS&lt;/strong&gt; -- but (haven't gone to VISTA yet) I much more enjoy the overall experience of working on a computer using &lt;strong&gt;WINDOWS XP&lt;/strong&gt;.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you can reach the point of over doing backgrounds&#8230; I personally love these backgrounds.&nbsp; To me&#8230; they break all of the sameness of the web up and create a pleasing EXTRA sort of appeal.&nbsp;I guess if the WHOLE OF YOUR FOCUS is the content, great cut the backgrounds&#8230; to me the overall VISUAL PRESENTATION is part of the content.&nbsp; I don&#8217;t read Sports Illustrated cause the content is so great &#8212; it is &#8212; but it&#8217;s a combination of the pictures and the content. &nbsp;&nbsp;Again&#8230; tastefulness must be exercised so the background doesn&#8217;t OVERWHLEM everything.&nbsp;&nbsp; Sidenote, the WINDOWS OS is bloated and sure I could actually get work done is <strong>DOS</strong> &#8212; but (haven&#8217;t gone to VISTA yet) I much more enjoy the overall experience of working on a computer using <strong>WINDOWS XP</strong>.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyGo</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110557</link>
		<author>tyGo</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110557</guid>
					<description>I can dig a big bold background. On one hand you've got minimal, on the other maximalism.Don't&#160; you just love a high-fiber diet sometimes, splash on more&#160; graphic sugar! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can dig a big bold background. On one hand you&#8217;ve got minimal, on the other maximalism.Don&#8217;t&nbsp; you just love a high-fiber diet sometimes, splash on more&nbsp; graphic sugar! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terri Ann</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110561</link>
		<author>Terri Ann</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110561</guid>
					<description>I love the style of these, and other similar sites, with the bold backgrounds.&#160; It really makes the site memorable, but&#160; when you come across a beautiful site and want to show the graphic designer at work cause you think they might like it, how do you Google &#34;rainbow exploding Chinese take-out box website layout&#34; or &#34;header photo Polaroid design.&#34; When a site's look/feel stands out that strongly it does make it more memorable, but does it make it easier to remember how to get to it?&#160; Is the site getting lost in the design, not the content, but the site overall identity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the style of these, and other similar sites, with the bold backgrounds.&nbsp; It really makes the site memorable, but&nbsp; when you come across a beautiful site and want to show the graphic designer at work cause you think they might like it, how do you Google &quot;rainbow exploding Chinese take-out box website layout&quot; or &quot;header photo Polaroid design.&quot; When a site&#8217;s look/feel stands out that strongly it does make it more memorable, but does it make it easier to remember how to get to it?&nbsp; Is the site getting lost in the design, not the content, but the site overall identity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcello</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110657</link>
		<author>Marcello</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110657</guid>
					<description>The statistics I've seen suggest that around 70 to 80% of internet users in the United States have broadband connections. If that's your target market, then go ahead and splurge on a big, beautiful background...But that's still 20 to 30% of your potential audience that might get frustrated with your site. That's a pretty significant number, especially for a consumer-oriented site. If you're trying to reach an international audience, that number could be much higher. And even broadband users might not want to wait for a 200K image -- people are *very* impatient these days!Personally, I design my sites primarily for functionality. I try to get the content to the consumer as quickly and easily as possible. Aesthetics are important of course, but for me the drawbacks of a massive background image outweigh the advantages.&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The statistics I&#8217;ve seen suggest that around 70 to 80% of internet users in the United States have broadband connections. If that&#8217;s your target market, then go ahead and splurge on a big, beautiful background&#8230;But that&#8217;s still 20 to 30% of your potential audience that might get frustrated with your site. That&#8217;s a pretty significant number, especially for a consumer-oriented site. If you&#8217;re trying to reach an international audience, that number could be much higher. And even broadband users might not want to wait for a 200K image &#8212; people are *very* impatient these days!Personally, I design my sites primarily for functionality. I try to get the content to the consumer as quickly and easily as possible. Aesthetics are important of course, but for me the drawbacks of a massive background image outweigh the advantages.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin Reams</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110663</link>
		<author>Devin Reams</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-110663</guid>
					<description>I definitely think its a lack of skills. If I could build something as beautiful as some of those I would spend the hours doing it......then again, I don't have many spare hours for my website. :\ </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely think its a lack of skills. If I could build something as beautiful as some of those I would spend the hours doing it&#8230;&#8230;then again, I don&#8217;t have many spare hours for my website. :\ </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Nickell</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111118</link>
		<author>Jake Nickell</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 03:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111118</guid>
					<description>http://www.mtv.com/ MTV's latest website uses it, that's pretty mainstream...&#160;&#160;  &#160;&#160;  &#160;&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mtv.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mtv.com/</a> MTV&#8217;s latest website uses it, that&#8217;s pretty mainstream&#8230;&nbsp;&nbsp;  &nbsp;&nbsp;  &nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111370</link>
		<author>Andrew Faulkner</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111370</guid>
					<description>Thanks for pointing out MTV. (UK folks, hit the US version to see it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing out MTV. (UK folks, hit the US version to see it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goetsu</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111425</link>
		<author>goetsu</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111425</guid>
					<description>on my own blog, I use it not for header but for the footer :http://www.fairytells.net&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on my own blog, I use it not for header but for the footer :http://www.fairytells.net&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justsayin</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111540</link>
		<author>justsayin</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111540</guid>
					<description>here's &lt;a href="http://daytimellp.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;one more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here&#8217;s <a href="http://daytimellp.com/" rel="nofollow">one more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111543</link>
		<author>Gavin</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111543</guid>
					<description>Yes mate. Always been a big fan of the simplicity of the Joshuaink layout and the jewel like complexity of the background. When we redesdined the Kyan site earlier this year this was a definite influence... &#60;a href=&#34;http://kyanmedia.com/&#34;&#62;http://kyanmedia.com&#60;/a&#62;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes mate. Always been a big fan of the simplicity of the Joshuaink layout and the jewel like complexity of the background. When we redesdined the Kyan site earlier this year this was a definite influence&#8230; &lt;a href=&quot;http://kyanmedia.com/&quot;&gt;http://kyanmedia.com&lt;/a&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robbin lang</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111705</link>
		<author>robbin lang</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111705</guid>
					<description>here is &lt;a href="http://moddpodd.com/" title="moddpodd" rel="nofollow"&gt;another one&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here is <a href="http://moddpodd.com/" title="moddpodd" rel="nofollow">another one</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Lane</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111760</link>
		<author>J Lane</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111760</guid>
					<description>From a design point of view, what width do you shoot for on one of these, or do you use some other kind of trickery to prevent it from doing a repeat-x on really large screens?I love the effect you can get from these. &#160;Gorgeous design.&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a design point of view, what width do you shoot for on one of these, or do you use some other kind of trickery to prevent it from doing a repeat-x on really large screens?I love the effect you can get from these. &nbsp;Gorgeous design.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lea</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111813</link>
		<author>Lea</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111813</guid>
					<description>This borrows heavily from the arts &#38; crafts movement (collages, murals, layering, etc) so it's not necessarily something &#34;new&#34; -- just hasn't been explored fully on the web yet. It seems as if the web keeps choosing a well-established graphic design technique used in print (like fundamentals of grid design, typography, whitespace) and then focuses on it for a while, until an intrepid designer gets bored and uses new inspiration and a new trend appears. These are simply inspired graphic design choices.  It's just not common within our web realm because the number of us who have actual fine art or illustrative leanings (never mind formal training on such) on top of being interested in the web are few.Tho, I have to say, it gives that extra almost-tangible feeling when visiting a website, because of all the textures and layers, as opposed to what we're used to: cool gradients, and metallic metaphors. Hence, why it's fresh. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This borrows heavily from the arts &amp; crafts movement (collages, murals, layering, etc) so it&#8217;s not necessarily something &quot;new&quot; &#8212; just hasn&#8217;t been explored fully on the web yet. It seems as if the web keeps choosing a well-established graphic design technique used in print (like fundamentals of grid design, typography, whitespace) and then focuses on it for a while, until an intrepid designer gets bored and uses new inspiration and a new trend appears. These are simply inspired graphic design choices.  It&#8217;s just not common within our web realm because the number of us who have actual fine art or illustrative leanings (never mind formal training on such) on top of being interested in the web are few.Tho, I have to say, it gives that extra almost-tangible feeling when visiting a website, because of all the textures and layers, as opposed to what we&#8217;re used to: cool gradients, and metallic metaphors. Hence, why it&#8217;s fresh. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lea</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111863</link>
		<author>Lea</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-111863</guid>
					<description>Oh, just another thing... I don't think it's necessarily about &#34;talent&#34; as much as it is about knowledge. People who have a keen interest in art and design history, whether this is through school or just a hobby, just tend to recognize other possibilities because their visual vocabulary has increased.That being said, talent can be attributed to someone who can see beyond the obvious to apply this visual vocabulary.&#160; :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, just another thing&#8230; I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s necessarily about &quot;talent&quot; as much as it is about knowledge. People who have a keen interest in art and design history, whether this is through school or just a hobby, just tend to recognize other possibilities because their visual vocabulary has increased.That being said, talent can be attributed to someone who can see beyond the obvious to apply this visual vocabulary.&nbsp; :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Ashwell &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-10-12</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-112030</link>
		<author>Marc Ashwell &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-10-12</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 21:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-112030</guid>
					<description>[...] » Big, Bold Backgrounds » fadtastic - a multi-author web design trends journal (tags: css design web backgrounds) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] » Big, Bold Backgrounds » fadtastic - a multi-author web design trends journal (tags: css design web backgrounds) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-112116</link>
		<author>Johan</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-112116</guid>
					<description>Hi Andrew,&#160;I think&#160; it is purely illustration art to do these backgrounds. It is a shame that is hidden behind the main content. But realistically it depends of the budget as well.You can do a beatifull website with less as well, does not mean that it is less effective.&#160;&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew,&nbsp;I think&nbsp; it is purely illustration art to do these backgrounds. It is a shame that is hidden behind the main content. But realistically it depends of the budget as well.You can do a beatifull website with less as well, does not mean that it is less effective.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: napyfab:blog&#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-10-12</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-112125</link>
		<author>napyfab:blog&#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-10-12</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-112125</guid>
					<description>[...] » Big, Bold Backgrounds » fadtastic - a multi-author web design trends journal (tags: css design web background inspiration webdev development) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] » Big, Bold Backgrounds » fadtastic - a multi-author web design trends journal (tags: css design web background inspiration webdev development) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Davis &#124; Blog &#187; Weekly Link Round-Up #2</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-112245</link>
		<author>Trevor Davis &#124; Blog &#187; Weekly Link Round-Up #2</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 02:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-112245</guid>
					<description>[...] Big, Bold Backgrounds [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Big, Bold Backgrounds [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moorecreative</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-112330</link>
		<author>moorecreative</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 04:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-112330</guid>
					<description>great article! we love working with wide designs and adding something exciting to the background. several sites we've designed have wider content backgrounds as part of the website design...http://www.hendrickmotorsports.coma mix of wider backgrounds with centered, focused content images that are still behind/around the main text content&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article! we love working with wide designs and adding something exciting to the background. several sites we&#8217;ve designed have wider content backgrounds as part of the website design&#8230;http://www.hendrickmotorsports.coma mix of wider backgrounds with centered, focused content images that are still behind/around the main text content&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113132</link>
		<author>Beth</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113132</guid>
					<description>I'd absolutely love a background like they have at Web Designer Wall/n.design or Malene Hald, but I sure couldn't make it myself.&#160; I'd guess that (talent) is what holds back a whole lot of us.Also, there's that cookie-cutter, bland, tired trend with the shiny/rounded/plain thing going on.&#160; For some reason, everyone seems to think that's the &lt;em&gt;best thing evar. &lt;/em&gt;I think it's overused and boring.&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d absolutely love a background like they have at Web Designer Wall/n.design or Malene Hald, but I sure couldn&#8217;t make it myself.&nbsp; I&#8217;d guess that (talent) is what holds back a whole lot of us.Also, there&#8217;s that cookie-cutter, bland, tired trend with the shiny/rounded/plain thing going on.&nbsp; For some reason, everyone seems to think that&#8217;s the <em>best thing evar. </em>I think it&#8217;s overused and boring.<em></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113137</link>
		<author>Beth</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 00:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113137</guid>
					<description>I should add that my site is graphics-intensive, and I do get people complaining about it being &#34;slow&#34; to load (usually 56K users, and only using IE6 &#38; older).&#160; So there probably are designers who simply won't do such things because they know the effects.&#160; My solution (of sorts) has been to have other themes available for people on slower connections.&#160; It seems to work for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should add that my site is graphics-intensive, and I do get people complaining about it being &quot;slow&quot; to load (usually 56K users, and only using IE6 &amp; older).&nbsp; So there probably are designers who simply won&#8217;t do such things because they know the effects.&nbsp; My solution (of sorts) has been to have other themes available for people on slower connections.&nbsp; It seems to work for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-10-14 &#124; MY Vast Right Wing Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113306</link>
		<author>links for 2007-10-14 &#124; MY Vast Right Wing Conspiracy</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113306</guid>
					<description>[...] Big Bold Backgrounds Some GORGEOUS websites, and a question: why don&#8217;t more designers do sites like these? (I think it&#8217;s a lack of artistic ability, plus fear of slow-loading websites.) (tags: design webdesign backgrounds graphics inspiration trends) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Big Bold Backgrounds Some GORGEOUS websites, and a question: why don&#8217;t more designers do sites like these? (I think it&#8217;s a lack of artistic ability, plus fear of slow-loading websites.) (tags: design webdesign backgrounds graphics inspiration trends) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neosapience</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113365</link>
		<author>Neosapience</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113365</guid>
					<description>Visual overkill. I love art myself, but when I'm trying to read information or watch a video, the last thing I need is a bazzillion flowers blaring in my eyes.&#160;Thanks but no thanks. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visual overkill. I love art myself, but when I&#8217;m trying to read information or watch a video, the last thing I need is a bazzillion flowers blaring in my eyes.&nbsp;Thanks but no thanks. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113459</link>
		<author>Sue</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113459</guid>
					<description>Actually, I used the Johuaink design on one of my blogs for a few weeks before deciding it was too busy. PNG transparencies also don't work too well in IE6 (still the most popular browser unfortunately) and there was a disgusting blue time to the content background image. I just think it's overkill to have a design like this. This is not print, it's the web, and there are too many people that do not have broadband. Or worse, pay by bandwidth used. Nice designs, but no thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I used the Johuaink design on one of my blogs for a few weeks before deciding it was too busy. PNG transparencies also don&#8217;t work too well in IE6 (still the most popular browser unfortunately) and there was a disgusting blue time to the content background image. I just think it&#8217;s overkill to have a design like this. This is not print, it&#8217;s the web, and there are too many people that do not have broadband. Or worse, pay by bandwidth used. Nice designs, but no thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juliuss</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113569</link>
		<author>juliuss</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 02:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113569</guid>
					<description>I agree with Neo -- it's pointless and distracting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Neo &#8212; it&#8217;s pointless and distracting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Davies</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113659</link>
		<author>Matt Davies</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113659</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;&#34;it&#8217;s pointless&#34;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160;Going back to my comment&#160; - I would dis-agree that its pointless. If it helps to add to the key messages of the site then I think its worth while&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If we said it was &#34;pointless&#34; then you could add this to any design element. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;it&rsquo;s pointless&quot;</p>
<p>&nbsp;Going back to my comment&nbsp; - I would dis-agree that its pointless. If it helps to add to the key messages of the site then I think its worth while</p>
<p>If we said it was &quot;pointless&quot; then you could add this to any design element. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113720</link>
		<author>Dana</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113720</guid>
					<description>Here's a site we worked on with a very extensive background - made to match their album cover: &lt;a href="http://www.thejunction.ca" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Junction&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a site we worked on with a very extensive background - made to match their album cover: <a href="http://www.thejunction.ca" rel="nofollow">The Junction</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links of Interest - CSS-Tricks</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113737</link>
		<author>Links of Interest - CSS-Tricks</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113737</guid>
					<description>[...] has a nice roundup of web site designs with big, bold backgrounds. This is certainly a trend lately, and I think it will continue since the only real strike against [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] has a nice roundup of web site designs with big, bold backgrounds. This is certainly a trend lately, and I think it will continue since the only real strike against [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: revy</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113746</link>
		<author>revy</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-113746</guid>
					<description>Nice collection of designs and good article. I have seen rips of Johuaink being sold in website auctions like sitepoint and private forums. So a good design will always be popular I suppose. I figure if people are ripping off your design and then selling it as their own, you're probably doing something right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice collection of designs and good article. I have seen rips of Johuaink being sold in website auctions like sitepoint and private forums. So a good design will always be popular I suppose. I figure if people are ripping off your design and then selling it as their own, you&#8217;re probably doing something right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schnuck</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-114870</link>
		<author>schnuck</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-114870</guid>
					<description>&#34;Visual overkill. I love art myself, but when I&#8217;m trying to read information or watch a video, the last thing I need is a bazzillion flowers blaring in my eyes. Thanks but no thanks.&#34;perfectly missing the point. surely one is allowed to do what one believes is good design on his/her PERSONAL website. if you want to watch a video, head over to mainstream youtube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Visual overkill. I love art myself, but when I&rsquo;m trying to read information or watch a video, the last thing I need is a bazzillion flowers blaring in my eyes. Thanks but no thanks.&quot;perfectly missing the point. surely one is allowed to do what one believes is good design on his/her PERSONAL website. if you want to watch a video, head over to mainstream youtube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wendy</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-115007</link>
		<author>wendy</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-115007</guid>
					<description>when you are living in a 3rd world country where at least a small % of your users are using dial up this is totally impracticle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when you are living in a 3rd world country where at least a small % of your users are using dial up this is totally impracticle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominik Lenk</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-115269</link>
		<author>Dominik Lenk</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-115269</guid>
					<description>I recently redesigned my own website, and one of the requirements for it was that the background added some personality: So I went for a very illustration based background image. (Only at the top though)I would love to hear what you guys think of the redesign: There is a blog post entitled 'Welcome to the Doodle Bush Edition', you can drop your comments there. Awesome. Thanks.Oh the URL is&#160;http://www.squawkdesign.com.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently redesigned my own website, and one of the requirements for it was that the background added some personality: So I went for a very illustration based background image. (Only at the top though)I would love to hear what you guys think of the redesign: There is a blog post entitled &#8216;Welcome to the Doodle Bush Edition&#8217;, you can drop your comments there. Awesome. Thanks.Oh the URL is&nbsp;http://www.squawkdesign.com&#8230;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franck</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-115611</link>
		<author>Franck</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-115611</guid>
					<description>The result can be great if it's well used like http://www.cobahair.co.uk/.Otherwise, big backgrounds are just useless decoration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The result can be great if it&#8217;s well used like <a href="http://www.cobahair.co.uk/.Otherwise," rel="nofollow">http://www.cobahair.co.uk/.Otherwise,</a> big backgrounds are just useless decoration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franck</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-115612</link>
		<author>Franck</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-115612</guid>
					<description>Correction, sorry.The result can be great if it&#8217;s well used like &lt;a href="http://www.cobahair.co.uk" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cobahair.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;Otherwise, big backgrounds are just useless decoration. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction, sorry.The result can be great if it&rsquo;s well used like <a href="http://www.cobahair.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.cobahair.co.uk</a>Otherwise, big backgrounds are just useless decoration. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fatih Hayrioğlu&#8217;nun not defteri &#187; 18 Ekim 2007 Web&#8217;den Seçme Haberler</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-115620</link>
		<author>Fatih Hayrioğlu&#8217;nun not defteri &#187; 18 Ekim 2007 Web&#8217;den Seçme Haberler</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-115620</guid>
					<description>[...] Web sayfalarında geniş zeminli resimlerin kullanımı. Bağlantı [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Web sayfalarında geniş zeminli resimlerin kullanımı. Bağlantı [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Salberg</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-115865</link>
		<author>Lawrence Salberg</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 03:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-115865</guid>
					<description>Seems to me the trend &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; increasing. Of course, for me, maybe its like owning that new car when you suddenly realize that everyone is driving the same car. But I see big backgrounds.... everywhere. Check out &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.worldofwarcraft.com&#34;&#62;World of Warcraft&#60;/a&#62;'s main site. It's done entirely in XML - and if you examine how they do the background, you'll see it is several images floated left and right, some of it hooked on certain elements. Maybe not entirely semantic (if you're a purist), but quite a nice effect and it doesn't require one giant image download, but gives the same feel. I also like &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.2advanced.com&#34;&#62;2 Advanced&#60;/a&#62;'s site, which although it is in flash (uh-oh - I'm in trouble now!), look at how bee-yoo-tee-ful and wide they are. When you visit different sections, the backgrounds change. Of course, 2 Advanced is a one of the top web firms in the country, but hey, what better to go visit their site and see why they keep getting all the big clients. As a result of all this inspiration, I've started adding flat file images to all my new clients websites. It allows the site to stay thin (800w) for small business clients who's customers may not have the latest monitors, but doesn't look super-thin on wide-screen monitors. I'm just finishing up a site for a dance studio (&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.dancezonebrevard.com&#34;&#62;The Dance Zone&#60;/a&#62;) and you can see I added two dancing girls that infringe on the main page, but expand widely off to the left and right so that the page doesn't look too thin. Because the girls are just one-color (grey), the background image is can be saved easily as a gif and&#160; isn't very large (16k). I highly recommend trying it when you design new projects. A great way to make a simple website (for a small business or quick blog) and make it look quite professional. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me the trend <em>is</em> increasing. Of course, for me, maybe its like owning that new car when you suddenly realize that everyone is driving the same car. But I see big backgrounds&#8230;. everywhere. Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldofwarcraft.com&quot;&gt;World of Warcraft&lt;/a&gt;&#8217;s main site. It&#8217;s done entirely in XML - and if you examine how they do the background, you&#8217;ll see it is several images floated left and right, some of it hooked on certain elements. Maybe not entirely semantic (if you&#8217;re a purist), but quite a nice effect and it doesn&#8217;t require one giant image download, but gives the same feel. I also like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.2advanced.com&quot;&gt;2 Advanced&lt;/a&gt;&#8217;s site, which although it is in flash (uh-oh - I&#8217;m in trouble now!), look at how bee-yoo-tee-ful and wide they are. When you visit different sections, the backgrounds change. Of course, 2 Advanced is a one of the top web firms in the country, but hey, what better to go visit their site and see why they keep getting all the big clients. As a result of all this inspiration, I&#8217;ve started adding flat file images to all my new clients websites. It allows the site to stay thin (800w) for small business clients who&#8217;s customers may not have the latest monitors, but doesn&#8217;t look super-thin on wide-screen monitors. I&#8217;m just finishing up a site for a dance studio (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dancezonebrevard.com&quot;&gt;The Dance Zone&lt;/a&gt;) and you can see I added two dancing girls that infringe on the main page, but expand widely off to the left and right so that the page doesn&#8217;t look too thin. Because the girls are just one-color (grey), the background image is can be saved easily as a gif and&nbsp; isn&#8217;t very large (16k). I highly recommend trying it when you design new projects. A great way to make a simple website (for a small business or quick blog) and make it look quite professional. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c. s.</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-116825</link>
		<author>c. s.</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-116825</guid>
					<description>Even though I don't feel I have the ability for such gran pieces of artwork, it's not what's stopping me from using this style of design. &#160;Large pieces of artwork are very limiting to the site's design. &#160;I prefer a&#160;cross&#160;between elastic and liquid in my own work, something that generally doesn't play very nicely with large images.&#160;p.&#160;s.&#160;Whatever&#160;javascript tomfoolery&#160;this&#160;form&#160;uses&#160;is&#160;breaking&#160;my&#160;browser's behavior and doesn't seem to work very well with css off, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though I don&#8217;t feel I have the ability for such gran pieces of artwork, it&#8217;s not what&#8217;s stopping me from using this style of design. &nbsp;Large pieces of artwork are very limiting to the site&#8217;s design. &nbsp;I prefer a&nbsp;cross&nbsp;between elastic and liquid in my own work, something that generally doesn&#8217;t play very nicely with large images.&nbsp;p.&nbsp;s.&nbsp;Whatever&nbsp;javascript tomfoolery&nbsp;this&nbsp;form&nbsp;uses&nbsp;is&nbsp;breaking&nbsp;my&nbsp;browser&#8217;s behavior and doesn&#8217;t seem to work very well with css off, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hggoto &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Big, Bold Backgrounds</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-118951</link>
		<author>hggoto &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Big, Bold Backgrounds</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-118951</guid>
					<description>[...] here to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] here to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netroads &#187; Big, Bold Backgrounds</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-118971</link>
		<author>netroads &#187; Big, Bold Backgrounds</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-118971</guid>
					<description>[...] sourced here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] sourced here [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Wrap Up &#124; Stephan Miller</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-121958</link>
		<author>Weekend Wrap Up &#124; Stephan Miller</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-121958</guid>
					<description>[...] am going to take a look at few site designs with big, bold backgrounds to see if that is an option for another blog I am working [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] am going to take a look at few site designs with big, bold backgrounds to see if that is an option for another blog I am working [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intricately beautiful backgrounds &#171; Hooked on design</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-122213</link>
		<author>Intricately beautiful backgrounds &#171; Hooked on design</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-122213</guid>
					<description>[...] are some websites that you probably just visit for the eye candy. I know I do  I bumped into this post by Andrew Faulkner, who happened to list some of my favorite [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] are some websites that you probably just visit for the eye candy. I know I do  I bumped into this post by Andrew Faulkner, who happened to list some of my favorite [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big, bold blockups - Design Deadline Blog</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-128685</link>
		<author>Big, bold blockups - Design Deadline Blog</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 07:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-128685</guid>
					<description>[...] had a great post a few weeks ago about Big, bold backgrounds and this is my version, with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] had a great post a few weeks ago about Big, bold backgrounds and this is my version, with [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: design simple web</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-131421</link>
		<author>design simple web</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 10:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-131421</guid>
					<description>about 3 years ago it will slow down loading website. Now we (web designers) can use it. THX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>about 3 years ago it will slow down loading website. Now we (web designers) can use it. THX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thank you for linking me &#124; Malene Hald</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-177464</link>
		<author>Thank you for linking me &#124; Malene Hald</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-177464</guid>
					<description>[...]    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]    [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Most Inspired Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 6 Methods to Make Your Website Standout</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-270541</link>
		<author>Most Inspired Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 6 Methods to Make Your Website Standout</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-270541</guid>
					<description>[...] For more designs that feature large background images, see Fadtastic&#8217;s Big, Bold Backgrounds. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] For more designs that feature large background images, see Fadtastic&#8217;s Big, Bold Backgrounds. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6 métodos para hacer que tu página destaque</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-274951</link>
		<author>6 métodos para hacer que tu página destaque</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-274951</guid>
					<description>[...] Puedes ver algunos diseños con grandes imágenes de fondo en Big, Bold Backgrounds [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Puedes ver algunos diseños con grandes imágenes de fondo en Big, Bold Backgrounds [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Algunos trucos para destacar en la web &#187; Cosas sencillas</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-276550</link>
		<author>Algunos trucos para destacar en la web &#187; Cosas sencillas</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/10/10/big-bold-backgrounds/#comment-276550</guid>
					<description>[...] Ejemplo: Webdesignerwall es un conocido sitio que hace uso de un fondo bastante grande. La estructura del sitio es bastante común, 2 columnas, pero la imagen de fondo le da a la página un toque que se aleja de lo estándar. Puedes ver algunos diseños con grandes imágenes de fondo en Big, Bold Backgrounds [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Ejemplo: Webdesignerwall es un conocido sitio que hace uso de un fondo bastante grande. La estructura del sitio es bastante común, 2 columnas, pero la imagen de fondo le da a la página un toque que se aleja de lo estándar. Puedes ver algunos diseños con grandes imágenes de fondo en Big, Bold Backgrounds [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
