Not a member? Why not join us or log in? (No more hassle filling in comments, less obtrusive ads and asides.)

Mobile Moans - The Logos Of The Mobile Industry

Posted by Matt Davies on July 17th, 2007.

Creative designer and founder of Attitude Design. View our Graphic Design Portfolio.

http://attitudedesign.co.uk

Matt Davies has posted 27 articles.

RSS Feed for fadtastic.net RSS Feed for Matt Davies

Full Profile →

Do you design logos? If you do, you will understand the importance of looking around at what other companies are doing in regards to their brand identities. A true designer will always spend a lot of time comparing, reviewing and familiarizing himself with logo design trends so that his work stays fresh and his creativity is fuelled by practical useful and exciting ideas. In this article we focus on a very young industry with little design heritage to see how these companies portray themselves and try and find out why.

Bit Of Intro Blurb

The mobile (or “Cell” for those in US!) phone industry is a fast growing and competitive market place. Consisting of network providers and product manufacturers it is one of the most exciting and profitable markets around. We all want mobiles, we all seem to need them in today’s modern life. The statistics are amazing, with over 80% of people using mobiles in the world. In the UK it has been reported that there are more mobiles than people! These are unbelievable statistics considering the fact that before the 1990’s you couldn’t fit a mobile in your pocket and needed a few harnessed elephants to transport it around!

The future “looks bright” with manufacturers trying to get internet ready mobiles and 3G (third generation using video) technology into our pockets. After this there is the potential to improve voice recognition and satellite navigation features. Now apple has entered the market with a software focused phone and upped the competition, more innovation looks set to follow. This industry looks solid with demand and productivity walking hand in hand.

In this article we hope to take an overall look at the branding of some of the companies involved in this market. Bearing in mind that most do not have a heritage past 1990 (although there are exceptions) and have to appeal to a vast global audience this article hopes to peal back some layers and see if these industry leading companies can teach us a thing or two about branding. What do these following logos actually say about the companies behind them:

mobile phone logos

No Product References

One of the first things to notice is that we see no images depicting anything literal. I often come across clients who wish to have a very literal link between their products and their logo. You could say that the most obvious thing to do when sitting down to design a logo for a mobile phone manufacturer, would be to include and image of a mobile phone. That would be great, albeit lacking in creativity, if the mobile industry wasn’t as fast changing as it is now. The shape of the mobiles today will probably not be the shape of a mobile in 5 years time so to depict a product would probably be a bad idea. This mistake can easily be made and the principle can carry through to many product manufacturers and retailers.

Text Based

One thing you will notice is that most of these logos are all text based, using typography and font to communicate their brand image. In today’s logo infested era, fonts and typography are getting more and more important, (may I even suggest more important than a logos “mark”?) and this is more so the case if a logo is relying only on text to create a personality.

Colours

A way in which these companies distinguish themselves from each other is by using colour. It seems there are no rules in this regard. From T-Mobiles rather brash magenta, to Oranges orange, to Motorola’s black the market is open and very widely appealing colours have been used.

3D

Vodafone, Sony Eriksson, 3 and a few others, have 3D elements in their logos. It is an interesting fact that because of improvements in printing technology, gradient logos are now easily achievable working across both print and screen media. Since all of these logos have been designed in the last few years, could this be an indication of the way we are going to be perceiving logos and brand identities. Also could we suggest that animated logos might also be a part of branding projects as well – these 3D logos are animated on the screens of the devices that use them so I think we can so we will ;-)

Wide Audience Appeal

All of the above leads us to see that the companies in this industry are aiming themselves at the widest possible audience. These logos are very “safe” and carry across global cultures and nationalities without causing offence. It is always an important thing to consider when marketing globally, what different cultures will think of your brand. The wrong translation of phrases and the wrong perception of an image can really damage potential growth in a new country, offending, upsetting and enraging viewers. It would be interesting to see what would happen if a company emerged with a specific audience in mind, say at teenagers from the age of 13-16, whose branding and products were specific to that demographic. Splitting the focus into niche markets might prove profitable instead of using the scatter gun strategy and hoping that a wide audience will happily purchase products. Anybody got any views on this? Add a comment below…

Conclusion

So to conclude these brief considerations then we feel this young industry is showing the way in regards to 3D logos, but is lacking in the creativity of marks and iconic identity. The reason for this is the fact that companies are appealing to a world wide audience of all ages and so seem to be locked into using this “safe” option, relying on advertising to promote their brand and product personalities.

Do you think this works, dear reader? If there was a company directing all its assets at you, would that make you think before purchasing a mobile? Do you feel this open branding is useful or does it limit a company? Discuss…

Make A Comment

( 10 so far )

blockquote and a tags work here.

10 Responses to Mobile Moans - The Logos Of The Mobile Industry

Comments RSS Feed

[…] Mobile Moans - The Logos Of The Mobile Industry Mándalo a tu Twitter: :: temas que pueden estar relacionados :: Logos actuales 158 Logos Creativos para inspirarseRediseño de Logos famosos al estilo 2.0 […]

An interesting article. I was most interested in your point about product references. I had never really thought about this aspect of the logos of technology brands. Not just mobile technology, but any technology. Even some of the most acclaimed logos in the world have nothing to do with their products. Take BellSouth’s bell logo, for example. Sure, it has a vague connection to the old "clear as a bell" tagline, but who remembers that today? One interesting phenomenon. T-Mobile may not have intended it when they originally designed their logo, but they have done a relatively good job of connecting their logo to some sense of their goals over the years. The series of grey dots in their logo have come to mean connections, like connect-the-dots. The T in their logo connects the series. You can see this by looking at the startup screens on their mobile phones (<a href="http://www.modaco.com/content/uploads/post-65276-1155872359.gif">here’s an example</a>, though there are better ones out there). The dots are used to depict a grid, and one of them is highlighted in pink, presumably to indicate the customer holding the device.My point is (in a round-about-way), the more I think about it, connecting your logo to your product in the user’s MIND may be way more important than doing it literally. For example, when you see the Apple logo, you think of only one thing. When you see the Sony-Ericson logo, you think of one thing. Not because of some visual stimulation, but because they’ve done a fantastic job of connecting them FOR you. So is a logo nothing more than a pretty placeholder for a brandname? Or should it tell a customer something about the company? Looks like I’m answering some questions (which you didn’t even ask) with more questions.

J. Bradford
July 17th, 2007
#

Don’t confuse branding with identity. A logo is part of a company’s identity, not it’s branding. Branding is more about positioning a company or product in the audience’s mind. Anyway, who cares about that…Great article for discussion though, and I read somewhere that Orange actually had some problems in Asia regarding it’s logo’s colour. I can’t remember what orange represents there..probably bad luck or something. 

Richard
July 17th, 2007
#

@ J. Bradford - Good point. I always think that an aspiration logo does more to communicate what the company wants it to communicate by, as you put it, "connecting the logo to the product in the user’s MIND". It can install a deeper impression in peoples minds than a literal depiction of what the company does. Lots of that has do do with the way the logo is presented in advertising, and the T-mobile logo is a great example of this.

@ Richard - agreed "brand identity" is much more than a logo.However I use it within the context of a logo design and so I hope you’ll forgive the interchangeable use of the term within the article.

Matt Davies
July 17th, 2007
#

Great article, Matt. Love your insights into the product references.

Something of interest: I’m pretty sure that Vodafone launched a campaign launched at (I assume) older, less tech-savvy folk. They introduced a couple of mobile models (simple Nokia one’s I seem to remember) and the branding went against their usual ‘3d red speech mark’ look. I remember thinking that this was interesting - a simple brand for simple, no-fuss products.

You speak of a lack of creativity in the mobile companies’ marks. What would you suggest they do to spice things up but still carry their message (no pun intended) across? 

Andrew Faulkner
July 17th, 2007
#

Good question Andy! Of course its difficult to make a suggestion which would cover all the companies involved. Each have their own specific aims. Generally I would say some need to take a few risks.

Take "Orange" for example. A square box with orange written on it isn’t exactly inspiring, it works for them at the moment but what if they took the text out of the box, made the box 3d and put a "glow" in the middle of it. Add a tag line "Think inside the box" and you automatically have a whole new look, which communicates aspiration ideas through to the user every time they see the logo. Ok, that was off the top of my head and I haven’t done any research into Oranges ethics and audience and aims etc so I may be way off the mark, but my point is that by playing safe all the time you can miss out on some really good ways of instilling your persona into an audiences mind. The T-Mobile example was a good one, again they have used parts of the logo to communicate products with their brand – I wonder if the original designers of the logo came up with that idea? What if you can create a logo which does this in a smoother more natural way?

I would suggest that a company thinks of an aspiration ethic that they wish to stick by and ensure that their logo and the placement of their logo can help to assist in that goal.

I was unaware of the Vodafone campaign you mention. Sounds good though - I wonder if it was successful as it sounds like a great strategy. 

Matt Davies
July 18th, 2007
#

Good concise article. Thanks. A couple of thoughts here: You mentioned the logos are somewhat generic and so can appealing to a wide audience, but that they are also generic because of changing styles of their phones. However I don’t think you mentioned that these companies most likely do not want to pigeon hole themselves with one product (i.e. a cellphone). Furthermore, most of these companies are cellphone service providers and not necessarily cellphone makers, so they might brand a cellphone but they are far more concerned about connecting people and providing service.Another thought about why some logos shy away from using a mark that represents their product is because I tend to think that in MOST cases when a literal use of a product is used, unless it is shown cleverly and/or conceptually it can seem like you might think the audience to be dumb. If I see NOKIA’s logo it will probably appear on a cellphone or at a cellphone store, so I don’t need another cellphone in the logo telling me that they work primarily with cellphones. To me it seems too redundant and very unclever.My favorite logos will forever be the ones that are smart and point me in a direction of understanding what the company is ABOUT, not just what they do. In these examples I love Apple’s (knowledge, trying new things), FUJITSU’s (clever use of integrating infinity with the company to suggest that it is apart of the whole cycle of things), and O2’s too (because, though so simple, suggests to me that I need it for life). Virgin’s is also nice because of how it integrated the normal logo with the symbol of infinity and a hint of glowing information being sent across wires.One thought about the Orange logo. I agree that it might seem slightly boring, but I think it has more potential to use the square in many ways later (i.e. like making the square rotate to show the many sides of product Orange offers, or maybe it could be different types of squares like a room or a cellphone screen), but if they made it too specific too early they would limit their ability to stretch the logo for very creative branding campaigns (I believe you hinted at this when you said companies rely on advertising more than their logomarks). It is in that sense that a more specificly creative mark COULD make for a more boring brand. Thanks for the article. I am about to begin developing a logo so I will be referencing this soon

Nathan
September 4th, 2007
#

[…] Fadtastic - Logos de empresas de telefonia celular […]

I do think this is good but… I do think the bit about the companys not using something like a mobile phone as a companys icon is not really in the question i mean you dont see ICT companys with computers next to there logos or lets say TV companys with little TV icons! None the less great article and i really enjoyed it:)

Louis
September 5th, 2007
#

[…] Fadtastic – Logos de empresas de telefonia celular […]

↑ Jump up to the comment form

Related In Some Way, Shape Or Form

The above post has obviously kept you amused. Why not discover similar material:

The posts Pixel art: a forgotten art or not so …A shortcut to 456 Berea StreetBBC Radio / Brand Portfolio Brought Into LineThe Many Blessings of FadtasticA Bite Of The Apple / Apples New Website, are related to this post.

Or why not take time out to find out about the author of the post.