<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of WAPT</title>
	<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/03/14/review-of-wapt/</link>
	<description>thoughts on &#124; comments about &#124; examples of  } web design trends.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Julian On Software &#187; Low cost stress and load testing tool for PC: WAPT</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/03/14/review-of-wapt/#comment-62176</link>
		<author>Julian On Software &#187; Low cost stress and load testing tool for PC: WAPT</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 10:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/03/14/review-of-wapt/#comment-62176</guid>
					<description>[...] a great review of WAPT by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a great review of WAPT by [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nestor</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/03/14/review-of-wapt/#comment-131351</link>
		<author>nestor</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 07:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/03/14/review-of-wapt/#comment-131351</guid>
					<description>I've tried to use both - WAPT (loadtestingtool.com) and Testing Master. I would say that Testing Master (&lt;a href="http://www.siteloadtesting.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.siteloadtesting.com&lt;/a&gt;) &#160;simply has more functionds. And it allows you to test more effectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried to use both - WAPT (loadtestingtool.com) and Testing Master. I would say that Testing Master (<a href="http://www.siteloadtesting.com/" rel="nofollow">www.siteloadtesting.com</a>) &nbsp;simply has more functionds. And it allows you to test more effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
