<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of urbanfonts.com</title>
	<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/01/05/review-of-urbanfontscom/</link>
	<description>thoughts on &#124; comments about &#124; examples of  } web design trends.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Tor Bollingmo</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/01/05/review-of-urbanfontscom/#comment-21080</link>
		<author>Tor Bollingmo</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/01/05/review-of-urbanfontscom/#comment-21080</guid>
					<description>The site didn't give me a 'typographic' feel, looks way to much like a myspace sub page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site didn&#8217;t give me a &#8216;typographic&#8217; feel, looks way to much like a myspace sub page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avi</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/01/05/review-of-urbanfontscom/#comment-21081</link>
		<author>Avi</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/01/05/review-of-urbanfontscom/#comment-21081</guid>
					<description>Who company paid you to review this, if you don't mind disclosing? PayPerPost?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who company paid you to review this, if you don&#8217;t mind disclosing? PayPerPost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2007/01/05/review-of-urbanfontscom/#comment-21083</link>
		<author>Andrew Faulkner</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2007/01/05/review-of-urbanfontscom/#comment-21083</guid>
					<description>Tor,

That is my only criticism of the site. I still think it remains very usable and informative.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Who company paid you to review this?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

ReviewMe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tor,</p>
<p>That is my only criticism of the site. I still think it remains very usable and informative.</p>
<blockquote><p>Who company paid you to review this?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>ReviewMe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
