<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReviewMe Launched</title>
	<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/11/10/reviewme-launched/</link>
	<description>thoughts on &#124; comments about &#124; examples of  } web design trends.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/11/10/reviewme-launched/#comment-10546</link>
		<author>AJ</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/11/10/reviewme-launched/#comment-10546</guid>
					<description>Heh, we must have been writing this review at the same time. Sorry for cross posting, I always try to watch everyone else and make sure  I'm not posting what's been posted at similar sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, we must have been writing this review at the same time. Sorry for cross posting, I always try to watch everyone else and make sure  I&#8217;m not posting what&#8217;s been posted at similar sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/11/10/reviewme-launched/#comment-10547</link>
		<author>Andrew Faulkner</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/11/10/reviewme-launched/#comment-10547</guid>
					<description>But yours has pictures.   ;)

No worries. I don't know who was first anyway. Keep up the good work, AJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But yours has pictures.   ;)</p>
<p>No worries. I don&#8217;t know who was first anyway. Keep up the good work, AJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/11/10/reviewme-launched/#comment-10548</link>
		<author>AJ</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/11/10/reviewme-launched/#comment-10548</guid>
					<description>You too :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You too :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Bishop</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/11/10/reviewme-launched/#comment-11122</link>
		<author>Mike Bishop</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/11/10/reviewme-launched/#comment-11122</guid>
					<description>Not sure I am sold on the idea. OK... Reviews are great, getting paid for them... greater, but doesn't this encroach on the validity of the blogosphere? Someone will complain that a disclaimer had to be made or the disclaimer will find its way into the ".invisible" class and I can see the entire thing getting tainted quick. 

Thats one of the key defining points for Blogs is that they are by definition, fiercely independent. But don't listen to me, I fear change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure I am sold on the idea. OK&#8230; Reviews are great, getting paid for them&#8230; greater, but doesn&#8217;t this encroach on the validity of the blogosphere? Someone will complain that a disclaimer had to be made or the disclaimer will find its way into the &#8220;.invisible&#8221; class and I can see the entire thing getting tainted quick. </p>
<p>Thats one of the key defining points for Blogs is that they are by definition, fiercely independent. But don&#8217;t listen to me, I fear change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/11/10/reviewme-launched/#comment-11123</link>
		<author>Andrew Faulkner</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/11/10/reviewme-launched/#comment-11123</guid>
					<description>Mike. It's a good point. I am trialling it at the moment to see how it goes. I think that the fact that it is in the blogosphere coupled with the fact that you don't have to review a product positively means that honest reviews will come out of it at the end of the day.

A disclosure has to be made clearly on every post as far as I'm aware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike. It&#8217;s a good point. I am trialling it at the moment to see how it goes. I think that the fact that it is in the blogosphere coupled with the fact that you don&#8217;t have to review a product positively means that honest reviews will come out of it at the end of the day.</p>
<p>A disclosure has to be made clearly on every post as far as I&#8217;m aware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jem</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/11/10/reviewme-launched/#comment-11717</link>
		<author>Jem</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/11/10/reviewme-launched/#comment-11717</guid>
					<description>I blogged about ReviewMe recently too - it's interesting to see the hugely differing opinions on the subject. I personally haven't made up my mind on how I feel about it yet and think I'll wait a month or too before really judging it, so people can give an educated opinion at how well it works.

Btw: unrelated to the post but, I was reading AJ's first comment and saw it as "Sorry for cross posting, I always November 10th 2006 try to [...]" - it might be worth giving more visual distinction between the comment and info? Just a thought ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blogged about ReviewMe recently too - it&#8217;s interesting to see the hugely differing opinions on the subject. I personally haven&#8217;t made up my mind on how I feel about it yet and think I&#8217;ll wait a month or too before really judging it, so people can give an educated opinion at how well it works.</p>
<p>Btw: unrelated to the post but, I was reading AJ&#8217;s first comment and saw it as &#8220;Sorry for cross posting, I always November 10th 2006 try to [&#8230;]&#8221; - it might be worth giving more visual distinction between the comment and info? Just a thought ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/11/10/reviewme-launched/#comment-11719</link>
		<author>Andrew Faulkner</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/11/10/reviewme-launched/#comment-11719</guid>
					<description>Jem,

I think that ReviewMe is good &lt;strong&gt;only&lt;/strong&gt; if the reviews are honest.

And thanks for the comment tip. Noted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jem,</p>
<p>I think that ReviewMe is good <strong>only</strong> if the reviews are honest.</p>
<p>And thanks for the comment tip. Noted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
