Not a member? Why not join us or log in? (No more hassle filling in comments, less obtrusive ads and asides.)

Accessibility - Let it be for all

Posted by Andrew Faulkner on October 17th, 2006.

Andrew Faulkner is the admin at fadtastic. Andrew prides himself on standards-based, accessible web design in the city of Nottingham, UK. He believes in aesthetically pleasing accessible design and that 'standards compliant does not equal boring.'

http://fadtastic.net/

Andrew Faulkner has posted 211 articles.

RSS Feed for fadtastic.net RSS Feed for Andrew Faulkner

Full Profile →

The authors here at fadtastic have done great things. They’ve written about the latest in web design trends. The latest in standards. The forefront of design. One article struck me last week - and it was not really about any of these things. Matt’s Passion in Design made me think about one part of part of web design that I’ve maybe not given enough attention to recently - accessibility.

Accessibility was the reason I entered the web design industry. My passion for the things I do means that I must have goals. And my goal was to create accessible websites that don’t stifle creativity whilst ranking well in search engines. I guess that these 3 areas (accessibility/SEO/design) are the cornerstone of my skill set. Now I have made small waves in our little old town of Nottingham (UK), but I hope to produce a whole series of articles on accessibility.

What I don’t want to is to mention valid xhtml or WAI compliant code. Other people are better at writing about standards, accessibility and validators. It’s really not my style to point out the number of errors on a page. What I hope to do is to introduce small but significant ideas that will make the web more accessible to all. Yes - you read it - all.

And that brings me to my first article subject. It’s a bit of a rant but bear with me.

Think about the conversations you’ve had (whether real or online) or articles you’ve read recently. Now narrow it down to those centered on accessibility. How many times did they involve the words visually impaired or disabled users?

Accessibility is for all. By all means consider disabled users or the visually impaired - it is a very important subject. But please, when posting/writing on the Net, don’t mention just these subjects when debating accessibility issues. Imagine a newbie (10 points for the buzzword!) going to stylegala for instance. Imagine they read about accessibility in the forums. From the posts there it would seem that accessibility is about blind people. It is. But not just about blind people!

So my messages are to speak about accessibility and include everyone when giving accessibility tips. I’ll end on an example:

I read an article on AJAX accessibility that stated that when changing content on the screen via AJAX, one should make it obvious to visually impaired users. NO! Make it obvious to all.

Sorry for the rant and I apologise if I sound inconsiderate to those with access problems. It just needed to be said.

Let me know whether you liked this article and whether you’d like to see more about accessibility. And if you’re passionate about ‘real accessibility’ then why not become an author?

Make A Comment

( 14 so far )

blockquote and a tags work here.

14 Responses to Accessibility - Let it be for all

Comments RSS Feed

Preach ;-)

Tor Bollingmo
October 18th, 2006
#

By the gods of Thor from Walhalla …

I bring you ->

http://accessify.com/
http://joeclark.org/access/

Johan
October 18th, 2006
#

More please. I just lost a fight over the universities redesign. including an argument about skip links b eing only for those with vision impairments and hence browsing with stylesheets off.

Syteve
October 18th, 2006
#

More please. I just lost a fight over the universities redesign. including an argument about skip links b eing only for those with vision impairments and hence browsing with stylesheets off

This is also handy for mobile users that cannot scroll easily. And when styles are off since all content is underneath each other. Two extra arguments. Good implementation is http://www.themaninblue.com. Just go over the page.

Johan
October 18th, 2006
#

Johan,

You are preaching to the choir I love them since I have arthritis and limited manual dexterity - especially for forms

Syteve
October 18th, 2006
#

Syteve,

I hope that you get back in there and win that arguement! Good luck.

Does anyone have any thoughts on the points raised in the article? Are web designers here generally agreeing?

Andrew Faulkner
October 18th, 2006
#

You are preaching to the choir I love them since I have arthritis and limited manual dexterity - especially for forms

I have more psalms right here:

http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200605/skip_links_visible_or_hidden/

Johan
October 18th, 2006
#

You are right - a rant but a good rant which reminds us all that accessibility is not just about humans but also about robots. Slowly we are all coming around to the idea that the positives outweigh the negatives in accessibility. Nice one Andy…

Matt Davies
October 24th, 2006
#

Well said Andrew. My personal feeling is that many folks ignore the larger picture of accessibility because it immediately makes the problem amazingly more difficult. What you bring up may be slightly blurring the lines between accessibility and usability, but I definitely agree with you. Nice writeup.

P.J. Onori
October 24th, 2006
#

Yes, accessibility is a lot more than most designers and programmers are considering.

Now, I can only speak for the visually impaired, but this new fad of toning down colors, letting the writing basically bleed into the background by choosing an only slightly brighter color for the text is - let’s see if this gets banned here - absolute bull****. Following that fad excludes a huge number of people (also very young people) from what you are publishing on your site. You’re basically telling a larger number of (potential) readers to take a flying leap.

I consider it an insult to me as someone who has problems with his vision that I’m excluded from those sites by default.

Yes, my own site is far from accessible (tag soup, etc.), but at least I’m contemplating the issues, thinking of fixing things so, for example, screen readers can access it. I’m just not good enough at putting into practice what I have in mind.

What irks me is that many people are not thinking about those real (!) accessibility issues until they are hit by problems themselves. Mea culpa, by the way.

I have a lot more to say on the issue(s), but I’ll refrain. ;)

Volkher

Volkher Hofmann
October 27th, 2006
#

Volkher,

I think you’re hitting the nail on the head here. Real accessibility in my view is far more important than simply validating.

Andrew Faulkner
October 27th, 2006
#

Shaun Inman alerted me to vision problems that involve the exact opposite, people who have problems discerning dark letters on a bright background. I hadn’t thought about that at all.

Maybe a style switcher is really the best answer then?

Volkher Hofmann
October 27th, 2006
#

Or user stylesheets? If one has access issues (or maybe just personal preferences) then one can switch the background/font colors to overcome any issues.

I find this feature underused, maybe as the user has to know either:

- how to create a stylesheet
- or where to download a stylesheet to suit their issues.

If anyone knows of resources for this, then link away.

Andrew Faulkner
October 27th, 2006
#

Да уж Пока это у нас не сильно развито, так что придётся чуть подождать.

Вячеслав
July 21st, 2009
#

↑ Jump up to the comment form

Related In Some Way, Shape Or Form

The above post has obviously kept you amused. Why not discover similar material:

The posts Accessible can be BeautifulAccessibility matters to…You’re a standardista if… (Friday Fun)RoboBraille.org converts text to Braille/AudioFlash and Accessibility, are related to this post.

Or why not take time out to find out about the author of the post.