<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Trends Interview ~ Part 1 of 3</title>
	<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/</link>
	<description>thoughts on &#124; comments about &#124; examples of  } web design trends.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 05:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: DIARY OF A WEBSITE :: DESIGN BY CAFFEINE &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fadtastic trend interview</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2151</link>
		<author>DIARY OF A WEBSITE :: DESIGN BY CAFFEINE &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fadtastic trend interview</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2151</guid>
					<description>[...] Fadtastic has asked various designers their opinion on web design trends and their role on the web. The first part is now live and the answers are very interesting reading. Yours truly was interviewed and I found the process a really interesting one. I am going to put up all my answers in their entirity later on this evening for you all to view. Thanks to Andrew for the experience as I really enjoyed taking part and thinking more about trends and their impact on design.  Comment   About you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Fadtastic has asked various designers their opinion on web design trends and their role on the web. The first part is now live and the answers are very interesting reading. Yours truly was interviewed and I found the process a really interesting one. I am going to put up all my answers in their entirity later on this evening for you all to view. Thanks to Andrew for the experience as I really enjoyed taking part and thinking more about trends and their impact on design.  Comment   About you [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2156</link>
		<author>Gareth</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 21:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2156</guid>
					<description>great stuff!

i have to disagree with the comment that suggests the web 2.0 style is very easy to emulate. It might not be hard to throw some drop shadows, rounded corners and gradients together but very few do it effectively, sone well this 'style' is sublty beautiful. 

g.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great stuff!</p>
<p>i have to disagree with the comment that suggests the web 2.0 style is very easy to emulate. It might not be hard to throw some drop shadows, rounded corners and gradients together but very few do it effectively, sone well this &#8217;style&#8217; is sublty beautiful. </p>
<p>g.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Davies</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2159</link>
		<author>Matt Davies</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2159</guid>
					<description>G,

If you've done it once you can so easily replicate it in another colour and stick another logo on it. I could point you to a number of sites in the style that are virtually all the same bar colour, content and logo! That's easy if you ask me - if it was so tough then why isn't it a rare commodity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G,</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve done it once you can so easily replicate it in another colour and stick another logo on it. I could point you to a number of sites in the style that are virtually all the same bar colour, content and logo! That&#8217;s easy if you ask me - if it was so tough then why isn&#8217;t it a rare commodity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2163</link>
		<author>Gavin</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2163</guid>
					<description>Great read. I agree that Web 2.0 seems to be an era  rather than a style of web design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great read. I agree that Web 2.0 seems to be an era  rather than a style of web design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B.</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2164</link>
		<author>David B.</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2164</guid>
					<description>good, stuff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good, stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karmatosed</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2166</link>
		<author>karmatosed</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2166</guid>
					<description>If it is an era I am not looking forward to the retro web 2.0. I can see the primary colours from here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it is an era I am not looking forward to the retro web 2.0. I can see the primary colours from here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Torres</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2168</link>
		<author>Brian Torres</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2168</guid>
					<description>I agree with the fact that Web 2.0 trends only take away from originality. Whens the last time anyone saw a new and good grunge desgin? Or how about a futuristic design?

I haven't in a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the fact that Web 2.0 trends only take away from originality. Whens the last time anyone saw a new and good grunge desgin? Or how about a futuristic design?</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t in a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2171</link>
		<author>Johan</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2171</guid>
					<description>If you want to play save you could use (got a list from: http://mittermayr.wordpress.com/2006/02/03/20-culture/), a client might like it, but it is fashionable. But as any fad, it comes and goes as fast. 

Major MUST-DO’s:

    * Rounded Shapes
    * Shades
    * Sans Serif
    * Pastell v2.0
    * Footers
    * Buttons
    * Font-Size: Oversized
    * Descriptive HTML (XML style)

Major DO NOT’s:

    * Java Applets (Script is fine though)
    * Animated GIFs (the blinky ones)
    * 100% Flash Websites
    * Visible tables</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to play save you could use (got a list from: <a href="http://mittermayr.wordpress.com/2006/02/03/20-culture/" rel="nofollow">http://mittermayr.wordpress.com/2006/02/03/20-culture/</a>), a client might like it, but it is fashionable. But as any fad, it comes and goes as fast. </p>
<p>Major MUST-DO’s:</p>
<p>    * Rounded Shapes<br />
    * Shades<br />
    * Sans Serif<br />
    * Pastell v2.0<br />
    * Footers<br />
    * Buttons<br />
    * Font-Size: Oversized<br />
    * Descriptive HTML (XML style)</p>
<p>Major DO NOT’s:</p>
<p>    * Java Applets (Script is fine though)<br />
    * Animated GIFs (the blinky ones)<br />
    * 100% Flash Websites<br />
    * Visible tables</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2172</link>
		<author>Andrew Faulkner</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2172</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the link, Johan. Appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, Johan. Appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Davies</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2173</link>
		<author>Matt Davies</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2173</guid>
					<description>What will be interesting is when print design starts to be influenced by web 2.0 design - we may get web 2.0 style flyers though the letterbox - or web 2.0 brochure designs?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What will be interesting is when print design starts to be influenced by web 2.0 design - we may get web 2.0 style flyers though the letterbox - or web 2.0 brochure designs?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2174</link>
		<author>Andrew Faulkner</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2174</guid>
					<description>Do you think it will happen, Matt? Would the style be print friendly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think it will happen, Matt? Would the style be print friendly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlactose</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2176</link>
		<author>jlactose</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 11:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2176</guid>
					<description>i realize ie is the devil, but in it, this page does not work at all. each comment seems to be pulled more and more to the left, behind the vertical blue border. even the comment box clips text that goes past its right edge. just a little heads up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i realize ie is the devil, but in it, this page does not work at all. each comment seems to be pulled more and more to the left, behind the vertical blue border. even the comment box clips text that goes past its right edge. just a little heads up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2177</link>
		<author>Andrew Faulkner</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2177</guid>
					<description>jlactose,

Thanks very much. I weasn't aware of this. It's on the 'to do' list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jlactose,</p>
<p>Thanks very much. I weasn&#8217;t aware of this. It&#8217;s on the &#8216;to do&#8217; list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Teskey</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2179</link>
		<author>Steven Teskey</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2179</guid>
					<description>I think the greatest draw towards a style such as "Web 2.0" is that it is meant to showcase information, not just the graphical, candy coated exterior. Not everyone is a photoshop genius, but just about everyone can create some form of readible and usable content. Maybe this trend is more of a quiet revolution, the writer/everyday guy can have an acceptedly nice looking blog and have some sort of readerbase (bigger than anything he/she could muster before), not just those who shelled out for some Adobe product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the greatest draw towards a style such as &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; is that it is meant to showcase information, not just the graphical, candy coated exterior. Not everyone is a photoshop genius, but just about everyone can create some form of readible and usable content. Maybe this trend is more of a quiet revolution, the writer/everyday guy can have an acceptedly nice looking blog and have some sort of readerbase (bigger than anything he/she could muster before), not just those who shelled out for some Adobe product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Jones</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2184</link>
		<author>Bobby Jones</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 07:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2184</guid>
					<description>I would suggest to make the web page free of nooks and crannies, that's above all. It would end the wastage of time and unwanted crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest to make the web page free of nooks and crannies, that&#8217;s above all. It would end the wastage of time and unwanted crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2186</link>
		<author>Johan</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2186</guid>
					<description>A minimalistic design can be made by 
someone who does not know anything about creating advanced textures or other by means of PS or illustrator, just by using some colors and lines. If this persons knows how to make a page layout ... it can look superb.

The layout is most important, the rest is decoration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A minimalistic design can be made by<br />
someone who does not know anything about creating advanced textures or other by means of PS or illustrator, just by using some colors and lines. If this persons knows how to make a page layout &#8230; it can look superb.</p>
<p>The layout is most important, the rest is decoration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Designer über Trends &#8212; cne _LOG Archiv</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2187</link>
		<author>&#187; Designer über Trends &#8212; cne _LOG Archiv</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2187</guid>
					<description>[...] fadtastic - A Trends Interview ~ Part 1 of 3   Tags: Design, Trends        &#171; Nifty Corners Cube - Runde Ecken [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] fadtastic - A Trends Interview ~ Part 1 of 3   Tags: Design, Trends        &laquo; Nifty Corners Cube - Runde Ecken [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week’s Weekly Links of the Week - Week 9 &#187; SOME RANDOM DUDE</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2207</link>
		<author>This Week’s Weekly Links of the Week - Week 9 &#187; SOME RANDOM DUDE</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 03:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2207</guid>
					<description>[...] A Trends Interview (Part 1 of 3) - Fadtastic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A Trends Interview (Part 1 of 3) - Fadtastic [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karmatosed</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2243</link>
		<author>karmatosed</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 08:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2243</guid>
					<description>I would argue that minimalist designs are oftent the hardest to get right and that stating they are easy to do if you don't know how to do backgrounds is a bit of a narrow view. To carry off a truly great minimalist design it takes a lot of talent to get the balance right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would argue that minimalist designs are oftent the hardest to get right and that stating they are easy to do if you don&#8217;t know how to do backgrounds is a bit of a narrow view. To carry off a truly great minimalist design it takes a lot of talent to get the balance right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2246</link>
		<author>Johan</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2246</guid>
					<description>[quote comment="2243"]I would argue that minimalist designs are oftent the hardest to get right and that stating they are easy to do if you don't know how to do backgrounds is a bit of a narrow view. To carry off a truly great minimalist design it takes a lot of talent to get the balance right.[/quote]

You did not understand what I was trying to say. I meant making a website look pretty, is worth nothing without a balanced layout. In a minimal design, the lay-out works different than in a 
website full of decorative images. In a minimal design, typography and layout are the *flesh* and *bones*.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2243"><p>
I would argue that minimalist designs are oftent the hardest to get right and that stating they are easy to do if you don&#8217;t know how to do backgrounds is a bit of a narrow view. To carry off a truly great minimalist design it takes a lot of talent to get the balance right.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You did not understand what I was trying to say. I meant making a website look pretty, is worth nothing without a balanced layout. In a minimal design, the lay-out works different than in a<br />
website full of decorative images. In a minimal design, typography and layout are the *flesh* and *bones*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P.J. Onori</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2247</link>
		<author>P.J. Onori</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2247</guid>
					<description>[quote comment="2246"]In a minimal design, typography and layout are the *flesh* and *bones*.[/quote]

Isn't that how it should always be (minimalist or not)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2246"><p>
In a minimal design, typography and layout are the *flesh* and *bones*.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that how it should always be (minimalist or not)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karmatosed</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2273</link>
		<author>karmatosed</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2273</guid>
					<description>I think in a minimalist web design the key is the white space and how it is dealt. I would agree with typology and layout always being the core not just in minimalist design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in a minimalist web design the key is the white space and how it is dealt. I would agree with typology and layout always being the core not just in minimalist design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1983 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2006-07-21 Daily Catch</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2280</link>
		<author>1983 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2006-07-21 Daily Catch</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 04:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2280</guid>
					<description>[...] A Trends Interview An article on Web Trends, interesting read! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A Trends Interview An article on Web Trends, interesting read! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2288</link>
		<author>Johan</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2288</guid>
					<description>not typology: typography!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not typology: typography!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2295</link>
		<author>Johan</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2295</guid>
					<description>I only hope that innovation brings differentiation and perspectives. This web 2.0 stuff could lead to generalisation in web styles because it looks clean and bright. That would be a shame ... it should lead to more diversity in styles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only hope that innovation brings differentiation and perspectives. This web 2.0 stuff could lead to generalisation in web styles because it looks clean and bright. That would be a shame &#8230; it should lead to more diversity in styles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2296</link>
		<author>Andrew Faulkner</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2296</guid>
					<description>Maybe Web2.0 will evolve into different styles. Take a look back when people started doing standards compliant sites with divs and css - personally I think they did use to look very similar. I'm sure web2.0 will evolve in the same way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Web2.0 will evolve into different styles. Take a look back when people started doing standards compliant sites with divs and css - personally I think they did use to look very similar. I&#8217;m sure web2.0 will evolve in the same way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2310</link>
		<author>Johan</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-2310</guid>
					<description>dont forget that web 2.0 is besides a marketed term also a term that goes with a broad definition.

- http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
- http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2005/08/not_20.html


The whole web 2.0 paradigm has a lot to do with the increasing role of dynamics and interactivity. If we speak about a web 2.0 design style, it certainly looks dynamic  and hip. The net has evolved with the addition ofblogging (blogger, wordpress), social networking (eg furl, flicker), web services (basecamp).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dont forget that web 2.0 is besides a marketed term also a term that goes with a broad definition.</p>
<p>- <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html</a><br />
- <a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2005/08/not_20.html" rel="nofollow">http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2005/08/not_20.html</a></p>
<p>The whole web 2.0 paradigm has a lot to do with the increasing role of dynamics and interactivity. If we speak about a web 2.0 design style, it certainly looks dynamic  and hip. The net has evolved with the addition ofblogging (blogger, wordpress), social networking (eg furl, flicker), web services (basecamp).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DIARY OF A WEBSITE :: DESIGN BY CAFFEINE &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fadtastic trend interview full answers</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-3003</link>
		<author>DIARY OF A WEBSITE :: DESIGN BY CAFFEINE &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fadtastic trend interview full answers</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-3003</guid>
					<description>[...] Part 1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Part 1 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fadtastic - A Trends Interview - 5ThirtyOne</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-4846</link>
		<author>Fadtastic - A Trends Interview - 5ThirtyOne</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/07/09/a-trends-interview-part-1-of-3/#comment-4846</guid>
					<description>[...] It might now hurt to read through Part 1 &#38; Part 2 for an overall idea of recent happenings in the web community. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] It might now hurt to read through Part 1 &amp; Part 2 for an overall idea of recent happenings in the web community. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
