Not a member? Why not join us or log in? (No more hassle filling in comments, less obtrusive ads and asides.)

Navigating the Winding Roads of Hyperlink Usability

Posted by Jason Spector on May 30th, 2006.

I am an experienced web and interactive designer who loves what he does and tends to quote old Tex Avery and Chuck Jones cartoons just a little too much.

http://spectorbrain.com

Jason Spector has posted 3 articles.

RSS Feed for fadtastic.net RSS Feed for Jason Spector

Full Profile →

Hyperlinks are like most things in life - there’s a right way to use them and a wrong way. The choices we make in their visual treatment, content, user experience, and accessibility affect the success of your overall site.

Think about it another way. You’re driving down the road a little too slowly (especially to the people behind you) trying to find Main Street, a very common road. What subtle changes would help or hinder your success?

Here are some of the common good and bad practices of hyperlink usability.

GOOD: Make your links one consistent color and underline them.
Singing a very poor rendition of Garth Brooks, you drive happily along searching for the elusive Main Street. As you move along, your eye gravitates towards the green rectangular signs because you inherently know that those are street signs. Like these signs, a specific color and underline quickly signifies to the user that this is a link.
Source: Jakob Nielsen

BAD: Show text that is not a link underlined or with the same link color.
What if the Stop, School Crossing, and Falling Rock signs were also green rectangles? Not so easy to navigate anymore, especially during the “I’ve got friends in low places…” reprise. How would you know which is a street? The same goes for hyperlinks. Text that are not links should not be treated as such and vice versa. Blue should also be avoided since it’s the default hyperlink color and perceived to have the greatest clickability.

GOOD: Use different colors for visited and unvisited links.
What happens if there are three Main Streets in the area? What about ten? Instead of getting lost, wouldn’t it be nice if a road sign changed from bright green to a duller green to let you know that you already went down that street? Like these roads, different link colors help reduce navigational confusion for the user as long as they are different shades or variants of the same color.
Source: Jakob Nielsen

BAD: Keep all link states the same.
Would you know when to stop if the traffic light had three green lights? One out of three is pretty good odds. A long-standing usability guideline for navigation is to “help users understand where they’ve been, where they are, and where they can go (past, present, and future).” If this is not followed, users could revisit the same pages, get lost more easily, misinterpret links, and give up faster.

GOOD: Avoid changing links when the cursor hovers over them.
Imagine that every street sign you pass changes color, shape or font size. Kind of like driving in Vegas, isn’t it? And like Vegas, your site will appear more cluttered as the mouse moves around the screen. If you like hover states, I would probably go with a subtle color change from the unvisited state. It’s just enough to stand out but not enough annoy the user. Link titles (like ALT tags) that tell the user where they are going are also good practice.

BAD: Use bold and/or italic as a hovering effect.
This is not recommended because changing the text in this way increases the width of the font and may cause the text to realign.

GOOD: Do not use “Click Here”.
Try to avoid non-descriptive text. A link is supposed to “Explain what users will find at the other end of the link, and include some of the key information-carrying terms in the anchor text itself to enhance scannability and search engine optimization (SEO).”
Source: Jakob Nielsen

GOOD: Open new windows only for a specific reason.
Opening a new window disables the back button as well as annoys the user and clogs their toolbar. In most cases, only open a new window for a PDF or other non-web document, such as a large image. And make sure to give the user adequate warning by including a link title, secondary text, or a graphic icon (usually a double-window or a single-window with an outward arrow).
Source: Jakob Nielsen | SitePoint

ONE FINAL GOOD: Test your links.
You’ve driven through heavy traffic and traveled up and down many, many streets called Main, but you finally found the right address. Congratulations. So where’s the house? Why does that sign in the ground say, “404 Error: House Not Found”? After working so hard to follow best practices for your links, make sure they actually go somewhere. Smiley Cat offers some good advice on link checking software for the financially set and the financially strapped.
Source: Smiley Cat

Remember that these are guidelines, not absolutes. If your site utilizes different styles and techniques to reach your target audience and they work, then more power to you. But in most cases, some or all of these standards will aide in your on-line success.

Make A Comment

( 21 so far )

blockquote and a tags work here.

21 Responses to Navigating the Winding Roads of Hyperlink Usability

Comments RSS Feed

Looks like I’ve got some work to do with fad. ;)

Great article. I agree wholeheartedly with the majority of the points raised here. Often, links are designed with aesthetics in mind only. We’re all guilty.

Andrew Faulkner
May 30th, 2006
#

we should also think of internal links and external links. We could (as is done already) add a inline little icon aligned right of the link to make clear we are dealing with an externals.

For styling links

Using underlined beit

Johan Van Den Rym
May 30th, 2006
#

About chaging link on hover:
- in good there’s about chaning colors and other, but in bad it’s said that it is not ok to change font style. But changing background and/or font color is IMO ok
- and ALT is attribute, though for titles there’s TITLE attribute

About new windows:
- single window with arrow is AFAIK usually used to show external link

Anyway, pretty good article.

Piotrek Rybałtowski
May 30th, 2006
#

… dotted lines or full lines. For body text - or better said parapgraphs, it should be done like that. A hover style is IMHO most subtile when using nothing or a very small highlight (a fraction lighter than background-color), and when using dotted lines for links you make the hover a full line in the same color.

For lists, eg an archive list of articles, you dont want underlines but the same color as the underlined links in your paragraphs. They are internal links that make a seperate block.

Johan Van Den Rym
May 30th, 2006
#

Are you kidding me? Did you really just publish a dummy’s guide to hyperlink usage?

Why are you even here?

Garrison
May 30th, 2006
#

Garrison,

Believe it or not, links are still incorrectly used (I’m guilty I know.) So that surely means an article on correct link usage is valid. It’s trendy currently to spice up links so this article is a reminder of what links need to do.

Andrew Faulkner
May 30th, 2006
#

Thanks for all of your comments.

There are defintely some discussion points around internal vs. external links, regardless if it opens a new window. I have seen the double-window icon and the single-window with arrow icon both work equally well. For example, Yahoo news uses the double-window icon to show the reader they are being sent to an external site even though it’s in the same browser window.

I mentioned the hover status (or lack of) since it is considered good usability. Most sites I have encountered do use hover stats and I think it has become something that users expect, which is why I also suggested the subtle color shift.

However, I really like Johan’s suggestion of a dotted line in the unvisited state and the solid line in the hover state. I have struggled with links in paragraphs on my site because underlines visually crowd the text. I already use an underline as the hover state and I think the dotted line will solve my usability and content layout issues.

Thanks alot.

Spectorbrain
May 30th, 2006
#

All,

The above comment is my response. My blog name is Spectorbrain and I sometimes use it as a screen name when commenting on other sites. Sorry for the confusion.

Jason

Jason Spector
May 30th, 2006
#

Ugh, I’ve sinned a couple of time and sometimes I still do ie a:visited has the same color as the a:link. hehe

Some people do need a little more education in linking, for instance a dude who posted a design tutorial uses a black link without underlining it while the whole content is black - Ironic? Really funny stuff, only by chance my cursor hit the link…
good write up dude.

J0sh
May 30th, 2006
#

I’d disagree with the dotted underline as it would then cause confusion in some browers with the acronym and abbr tags. It’s an option, but not a good one.

Andrew Faulkner
May 30th, 2006
#

Garrison,

Good design is not necessarily good usability. Just because people in the web industry like us can decipher content, navigation, etc. does not mean the larger Internet audience can. My parents, for example, know that a link is underlined. All the other fancy stuff just distracts them. And the more you make people think about their next move, the more likely they will move to another site.

This post will obviously never cover all of the details of hyperlink usability. It is a blog post, not a white paper. But I hope it will help some people, even a small amount, to create a more consistent on-line user experience.

Jason Spector
May 30th, 2006
#

Andrew,

Good point. I hadn’t considered that.

Jason Spector
May 30th, 2006
#

Good point, Andrew about the default styling of the <abbr> (not supported in IE6) or <acronym> (all browser).

Though if styles are off: links get the default blue, and eg <acronym> get dotted underlines. However thanks to CSS, you can add acronym {cursor:help} to your CSS file and when you hover it, you see the little question mark and arrow.

Johan Van Den Rym
May 30th, 2006
#

[…] Remember that these are guidelines, not absolutes. If your site utilizes different styles and techniques to reach your target audience and they work, then more power to you. But in most cases, some or all of these standards will aide in your on-line success. [ also posted on Fadtastic.net ] […]

What I mean is, this is the kind of article I would expect to find on Webmonkey or some other dev-for-dummies/usability site, not on a site that purports to be about ‘web design trends’. You guys can’t announce that you’re about one thing and then be about everything else. Focus, focus, focus. That, or change your damn name and mission statement to something that actually fits what you’re doing.

Garrison
May 30th, 2006
#

Garrison,

So you dont have anything useful to say about links. For your information, my man Stu Nicholls published his niftly CSS tutorials on http://www.webreference.com/authoring/style/sheets/. So that is just basic styling of an unordered list. Maybe check it out. You might focuss on that one.

I will show you what interactive discussions are.

Some interesting linkage to keep you busy

- Smart ‘back to top’ link

http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2006/05/22/smart-back-to-top-link/

- New window link

http://webdesign.maratz.com/lab/new_window_link/

- Pdf linking

http://webdesign.maratz.com/lab/pdf_links_labeling/

- Visited Link styling

http://webdesign.maratz.com/lab/visited_links_styling/

- rel=nofollow why do that?

http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/006800.html

- links for print

http://www.alistapart.com/articles/improvingprint

Johan
May 30th, 2006
#

I agree that the article covers relatively basic topics on link design, but I think it could be considered very helpful as it has good explanations of why something is good or bad.

Nice article. :)

P.J. Onori
May 31st, 2006
#

It’s a very helpful reminder about how things should be done, accessibly that is. I don’t mind that it’s on a “fad” site, infact one could say that it’s meant to correct some fads that aren’t particularily helpful to the user. I know I’ve done the whole a:visted == a thing, and I’m glad that I read this, because it brings light to an important topic that we designers often forget. Of course we understand, as we designed it, regular users may not be so keen.

Great job Jason.

Steven Teskey
May 31st, 2006
#

[…] Para complementar esto, en Fadtastic se inició una discusión del aspecto de diseño de los links. La esencia en ambos casos es la misma: se trata de respetar las convenciones adoptadas en los inicios de la web, y no alterarlas más de lo debido a la percepción del usuario. […]

It should be clear that a link opens a new window or not. This behavior is not consistent right now. Many times I accidentally close the window and then I can’t go back; other times there are too many windows on the desktop. A simple scheme can be applied instead of a “warning”, such as a special icon or symbol. But then the consistency of this icon and symbol is a problem.

Jack Zheng
June 9th, 2006
#

[…] Remember that these are guidelines, not absolutes. If your site utilizes different styles and techniques to reach your target audience and they work, then more power to you. But in most cases, some or all of these standards will aide in your on-line success. [ also posted on Fadtastic.net ] Tags: usability, content, design, hyperlink, web design, user experience […]

↑ Jump up to the comment form

Related In Some Way, Shape Or Form

The above post has obviously kept you amused. Why not discover similar material:

The posts Tips that Help You Attract and Retain Web Visitors30 Usability Issues To Be Aware OfDon’t make me think - A common sense approach to Web UsabilityReview of Max Web Design BlogWhen Less Isn’t Less, are related to this post.

Or why not take time out to find out about the author of the post.