“Beta”, Does Anyone Care Any More?
Posted by Steven Teskey on May 12th, 2006.
Whilst browsing my favorite design/standards based sites, I noticed a post about an up and coming site. I’m not going to name names, but this particular site just happened to have a “Beta” styled launch page. It was no different from any other coming soon page I’ve seen in the last little while, containing the name of the site, purpose of the site, and a little input for your email so you may be notified of it’s launch. On any other day I wouldn’t have cared, I mean there are beta pages everywhere now a days, but today I noticed that some very good designers in contraversy over the news.
The issue started when one designer (remember, I’m not naming names here) called this comming soon deelie a fad, that everyone’s doing them when they’re not neccessary. To be honest I kind of agree with him, not because I respect him so much, but because one shouldn’t be launching a product with out any product to sell. This is where I started to trip over myself, I thought “this is entirely hypocritical, I put up ‘coming soon’ pages all the time” so fad or not I’m as guilty of the charge as any web two point hoe start up. I constantly change my mind and destroy sites, but I can’t greet new comers with nothing, they have to know that something’s going on here, that they haven’t reached the end of the internet.
I then began to wonder why does anyone put up a “beta” page? Then it hit me like a ton of bricks, to create hype about the property. Now for the post in question, and the controversy surrounding it, I had to look at it again. This person didn’t post the site to show off his skills, or to make anyone angry, they did it to create interest in the brand. We as humans have a horrible weakness called curiosity, we just can’t keep on our side of the fence, we need to know what’s on the other side. This has been capitalized on by every web start up since I can remember, and in short, it works. How many people waited and drooled over Google Analytics? Or Newsvine? I know that I was so very anxious while waiting for a service to go live, and I can’t be the only one.
These coming soon pages can’t be called a fad then, as they’ve been around forever (that and Ryan Sims would be one of the biggest fad-followers as of recent), but one can conclude that the use of the term “beta” is. I mean Google’s cool right? And most of their services are probably not even destined to leave beta. In fact I think there’s something about the word that makes people light up, as if there’s some promise of good at the end of the road.
So, if you want to be original and not a fad-follower, refrain from the use of the word “beta”, even though it’s possible to still be cool after using it, take for example Jared Christensen (beautiful site by the way). Maybe it’d be better if we all just stayed away from all the buzzwords and other fad related stuff, cause that makes us cooler than everyone that follows the norm. Hopefully not everyone will take my advice, otherwise I’ll have to go back to using the old fads, as using none of them will soon become a fad, what a paradox.
Make A Comment
( 6 so far )
6 Responses to “Beta”, Does Anyone Care Any More?
It depends how it’s used.
Some companies/individuals use the term beta willy-nilly. There’s no point. A beta site should offer info and the chance for the user to give their input.
Betas are a right mixed bag at the moment in my opinion, and judging by that conversation on the Gala at the moment they can be loved or hated. They are the Marmite of design/development trends. ;)
Beta is normally used for a stage in software development or a coding project which is not defined as stable yet.
When it is stable it gets labelled 1.0
http://alwaysbeta.com/ even carries that very name. A good webinfo site I think.
http://www.thedesignersnews.com/
it is counter-productive to use this way of announcement. People want to see the launch immediate, opposite for software or a competition ok: I can see that it can be a valid way.
another example: http://www.crazyegg.com/ stuck in beta
a fun example: http://alwaysbeta.com/ quite the opposite
Personally, I consider the term Beta to be intended to be a cover-you-ass strategy. If things aren’t working properly, you can say, “Of course they aren’t. It’s Beta.”. Honestly, I understand. Many of these betas are offered up for free and nailing down 100% of the bugs can be extremely time-consuming. It doesn’t bother me in the slightest - they’re getting something out there for people to consume. More power to them. :)
As for the promotional aspect of things, I would be ridiculously hypocritical if I criticized anyone for such tactics. People who are proud of their work usually want people to notice it. I agree, it can be annoying (yes, that included myself), but I have rarely seen it done (spam not included) without the best intentions. I’m really curious what people have to say about this.
For me, getting to work with a beta was like getting in on the ground floor. I tested a few games and loved being able to walk into a store when they came out and bragging to my friends “Oh hey, I played that 6 months ago”. For a week or two after the game came out I was better then everyone else at it too. Weeeeeeeeee
With products that never leave beta, it isn’t as exciting. It does seem like something done to cover the arse of the developer if something goes wrong. Or maybe they just forgot the Beta label was there.
I never cared and I never will. What ever blows your whistle - alpha beta or zeta…
Related In Some Way, Shape Or Form
The above post has obviously kept you amused. Why not discover similar material:
The posts Making Websites Beta, Apple - Safari 3 Public Beta, Andy Rutledge, TrendWatch Test, Re-design announcement!, are related to this post.
Or why not take time out to find out about the author of the post.



