<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A review of last week&#8217;s CNN.com and NYTimes.com redesigns</title>
	<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/04/09/a-review-of-last-weeks-cnncom-and-nytimescom-redesigns/</link>
	<description>thoughts on &#124; comments about &#124; examples of  } web design trends.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/04/09/a-review-of-last-weeks-cnncom-and-nytimescom-redesigns/#comment-807</link>
		<author>Andrew Faulkner</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/04/09/a-review-of-last-weeks-cnncom-and-nytimescom-redesigns/#comment-807</guid>
					<description>Excellent article, Andrew.

I read the BBC news sections every day and although it's always my first (and favoured) source for news, I feel it does miss having some editorial influence by visitors.

Well done to CNN and NYTimes for bringing classic news sites into 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article, Andrew.</p>
<p>I read the BBC news sections every day and although it&#8217;s always my first (and favoured) source for news, I feel it does miss having some editorial influence by visitors.</p>
<p>Well done to CNN and NYTimes for bringing classic news sites into 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Renaud</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/04/09/a-review-of-last-weeks-cnncom-and-nytimescom-redesigns/#comment-814</link>
		<author>Phil Renaud</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 16:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/04/09/a-review-of-last-weeks-cnncom-and-nytimescom-redesigns/#comment-814</guid>
					<description>the new CNN and NYT pages are more re-aligns than anything else, and that's becoming a good trend in mature web design: people seem to no longer want to scrap everything and start fresh, but just pick and choose the bad parts to get rid of in previous design and just rework them slightly.

Still, both these sites are ones that I prefer to read by way of RSS feeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the new CNN and NYT pages are more re-aligns than anything else, and that&#8217;s becoming a good trend in mature web design: people seem to no longer want to scrap everything and start fresh, but just pick and choose the bad parts to get rid of in previous design and just rework them slightly.</p>
<p>Still, both these sites are ones that I prefer to read by way of RSS feeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan Van Den Rym</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/04/09/a-review-of-last-weeks-cnncom-and-nytimescom-redesigns/#comment-816</link>
		<author>Johan Van Den Rym</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/04/09/a-review-of-last-weeks-cnncom-and-nytimescom-redesigns/#comment-816</guid>
					<description>As far as newspapers go I found the &lt;a href="”http://www.guardian.co.uk/”" rel="nofollow"&gt;Guardian from the UK&lt;/a&gt;  to be a very good online newspaper that has a good lay-out, intuitive interface, and an excellent &lt;a href="”http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/”" rel="nofollow"&gt;blog section&lt;/a&gt; (already for some time which allows people to comment on various topics.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as newspapers go I found the <a href="”http://www.guardian.co.uk/”" rel="nofollow">Guardian from the UK</a>  to be a very good online newspaper that has a good lay-out, intuitive interface, and an excellent <a href="”http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/”" rel="nofollow">blog section</a> (already for some time which allows people to comment on various topics.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2006/04/09/a-review-of-last-weeks-cnncom-and-nytimescom-redesigns/#comment-5365</link>
		<author>Vanessa</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2006/04/09/a-review-of-last-weeks-cnncom-and-nytimescom-redesigns/#comment-5365</guid>
					<description>Mr. Whitacre:
How much redesigns has CNN from 1980 to
2006?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Whitacre:<br />
How much redesigns has CNN from 1980 to<br />
2006?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
