<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Click and Hope Navigation</title>
	<link>http://fadtastic.net/2005/09/16/25/</link>
	<description>thoughts on &#124; comments about &#124; examples of  } web design trends.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2005/09/16/25/#comment-56</link>
		<author>Tom</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2005/09/16/25/#comment-56</guid>
					<description>I don't think we'll see this being used by any of the 'big' designers anytime soon. Most of them these days evangelise accessibily and useablility - and many of them hate flash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll see this being used by any of the &#8216;big&#8217; designers anytime soon. Most of them these days evangelise accessibily and useablility - and many of them hate flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2005/09/16/25/#comment-59</link>
		<author>Cat</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 04:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2005/09/16/25/#comment-59</guid>
					<description>I've also heard this type of nativation referred to as 'mystery meat' navigation. It used to be popular in early web days, because it was thought to foster 'exploration'. We all know, of course, that most visitors aren't online to explore, but rather get information as easily as possible. The only time I've seen this used effectively is on kids' website, where playing and exploring is the goal of the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also heard this type of nativation referred to as &#8216;mystery meat&#8217; navigation. It used to be popular in early web days, because it was thought to foster &#8216;exploration&#8217;. We all know, of course, that most visitors aren&#8217;t online to explore, but rather get information as easily as possible. The only time I&#8217;ve seen this used effectively is on kids&#8217; website, where playing and exploring is the goal of the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2005/09/16/25/#comment-60</link>
		<author>Gavin</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 15:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2005/09/16/25/#comment-60</guid>
					<description>I agree with those comments. "Click and hope" navigation seems to be for those that like interaction, and suspense but use it in the wrong ways.

I can only see this type of navigation as being all right if it had an intelligent way of maturing itself after the user has visited it.

Lets say for example you visit a site and three circles appear with no names on the, so you click one to find it reveals the "about" page, when you see the navigation again it says "about" in the circle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with those comments. &#8220;Click and hope&#8221; navigation seems to be for those that like interaction, and suspense but use it in the wrong ways.</p>
<p>I can only see this type of navigation as being all right if it had an intelligent way of maturing itself after the user has visited it.</p>
<p>Lets say for example you visit a site and three circles appear with no names on the, so you click one to find it reveals the &#8220;about&#8221; page, when you see the navigation again it says &#8220;about&#8221; in the circle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fadtastic - a web trends journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cutting it out</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2005/09/16/25/#comment-62</link>
		<author>fadtastic - a web trends journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cutting it out</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2005/09/16/25/#comment-62</guid>
					<description>[...] Now the critics out there may say &#8220;But you ranted on about this.&#8221; Well my response to that would be to inform you that this badge isn&#8217;t relied on to navigate around a site. It just provides an interesting way to get to content already available through the conventional site navigation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Now the critics out there may say &#8220;But you ranted on about this.&#8221; Well my response to that would be to inform you that this badge isn&#8217;t relied on to navigate around a site. It just provides an interesting way to get to content already available through the conventional site navigation. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julien Meyer</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2005/09/16/25/#comment-131</link>
		<author>Julien Meyer</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2005/09/16/25/#comment-131</guid>
					<description>This kind of "Click 'n Hope" technique reminds me of the famous article written by Vincent Flanders, called 

&lt;a href="http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/mysterymeatnavigation.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Mystery  Meat Navigation&lt;/a&gt;, as Cat was saying. It is also a question of usibility, maybe more than a "look and feel" perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of &#8220;Click &#8216;n Hope&#8221; technique reminds me of the famous article written by Vincent Flanders, called </p>
<p><a href="http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/mysterymeatnavigation.html" rel="nofollow">Mystery  Meat Navigation</a>, as Cat was saying. It is also a question of usibility, maybe more than a &#8220;look and feel&#8221; perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://fadtastic.net/2005/09/16/25/#comment-132</link>
		<author>Andrew Faulkner</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fadtastic.net/2005/09/16/25/#comment-132</guid>
					<description>Julien,

Thanks for the article link. I'm glad someone else is frustrated with this navigation type.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julien,</p>
<p>Thanks for the article link. I&#8217;m glad someone else is frustrated with this navigation type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
